This simple distinction that Matthew Henry makes here is the very one our nation and most of our churches are incapable of making today. This is because we are more catechized by a feminized Egalitarianism than God's word on this point, or even our own Reformed catechisms and commentators: "And as being heirs together: another reason why husbands should give honour to their wives, viz. because though by nature they are weak and unequal to their husbands, yet they are equal to them in respect of their being called to the same grace and glory, there being neither male nor female in Christ, Galatians 3:28." Today, if you say that women or the female sex are "weak and unequal" in any sense, especially by nature, you will be accused of claiming that women are unequal in the latter sense that Henry lists here, namely, you will be accused of saying women are not equal to men in terms of being called to grace and glory. They will use the very same passage, Galatians 3...
From Calvin's commentary on Genesis 2: “But although God pronounced, concerning Adam, that it would not be profitable for him to be alone, yet I do not restrict the declaration to his person alone, but rather regard it as a common law of man's vocation, so that every one ought to receive it as said to himself, that solitude is not good, excepting only him whom God exempts as by a special privilege. Many think that celibacy conduces to their advantage, [138] and therefore, abstain from marriage, lest they should be miserable. Not only have heathen writers defined that to be a happy life which is passed without a wife, but the first book of Jerome, against Jovinian, is stuffed with petulant reproaches, by which he attempts to render hallowed wedlock both hateful and infamous. To these wicked suggestions of Satan let the faithful learn to oppose this declaration of God, by which he ordains the conjugal life for man, not to his destruction, but to his salvation.” ...."Certainl...