Skip to main content

Slate Asks: Was Jesus A Homophobe?




By: Sean Rice

An American publication named Slate recently published an article by Will Oremus called 'Was Jesus a Homophobe?'* Surprisingly, given that it is a pretty left-leaning publication, I actually agree with a lot of what Oremus had to say. He doesn't seem to stretch facts to come to favourable conclusions. He does criticize Paul for wording things a little harshly when it comes to homosexuality (most Christians would criticize Paul's use of language, too - how many of you would stay if your pastor dismissively told the troublemakers in your church to castrate themselves? See Galatians 5.12), though I don't disagree with the strong tone that Paul sometimes takes on issues. Will Oremus writes,
'[Was Jesus a homophobe?] Yes and no. While it's reasonable to assume that Jesus and his fellow Jews in first-century Palestine would have disapproved of gay sex, there is no record of his ever having mentioned homosexuality, let alone expressed particular revulsion about it. In Leviticus, the Old Testament declares it "an abomination" for a man to lie with a man; the punishment was death. It’s possible that attitudes would have been less draconian in Galilee, the region in northern Israel where Jesus spent most of his life, since it did have a reputation for political autonomy. Still, Jews of the time tended to be less sexually permissive than those in Rome or Egypt, so same-sex relationships would have been kept quiet... 
...Even if Jesus viewed homosexuality as a sin, he had a penchant for reaching out to sinners rather than shunning them. Criticized by the Pharisees for dining with tax collectors, he likened sinners to lost sheep; the goal was to bring them back into the fold. Not all of Jesus’ followers took such a tender view, however. In Romans I, Paul denounced gay sex as unnatural—an example of pagan decadence—and said it would bring the wrath of God.'
MY FAVOURITE PART OF SLATE'S ARTICLE
I love that last paragraph. 'Even if Jesus viewed homosexuality as a sin, he had a penchant for reaching out to sinners rather than shunning them. Criticized by the Pharisees for dining with tax collectors, he likened sinners to lost sheep; the goal was to bring them back into the fold.' I volunteer extensively in a small church in Saskatchewan, and while there are some pretty open-minded -yet theologically conservative- people in the Christian community, the desire to be 'reaching out to sinners rather than shunning them' isn't a desire that is shared by everybody. On this, we Christians desperately need to follow Jesus.

ADDING MY TWO CENTS TO THE DISCUSSION
It is worth adding that Jesus more than likely believed that homosexuality was a sin. He taught this. InMark 7.20-21 Jesus explained that 'what comes out of a person is what defiles him. For from within, out of the heart of man, comes... sexual immorality'. That Jesus would so casually, and without explanation, mention sexual immorality means that those he taught would likely have had a shared definition of what it was. That shared definition likely came from the list in Leviticus 18.1-30, where homosexuality is listed inLeviticus 18.22. In that small, passing reference at least, Jesus did teach on homosexuality and at least a dozen other sorts of sexual immorality. The fact that it rarely came up in Jesus' teaching suggests it wasn't a common practice in Galilee or Judea during the early 30's when Jesus was fulfilling his ministry.

We can't say that Jesus didn't teach on the subject. What we can do is reach out rather than shun.

That's all for today,
-Sean

--------------------
*Oremus, Will, 'Was Jesus a Homophobe?' For the full article, visit here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true faith, is

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many