Skip to main content

CSFF Blog Tour: The Shadow Lamp Day 2




By: Thomas F. Booher

I do hope the final book in The Bright Empires Series takes a step back to what the Bible actually says.

(As a side note, I went through this book and highlighted new words or words I hardly ever use, and nearly every page had something highlighted on account of this alone. That shows you how strong Mr. Lawhead's vocabulary is.) But now back to the main point of this post. 

I've found it very interesting that in The Shadow Lamp we have an apparent contradiction over God's sovereignty. Consider:

1. On p. 351 we see a character praising God for His "All-Wise Providence" in sparing his life when he could have easily drowned in the rapids of a flash flood.

2. On p. 358 Gianni expresses a belief in "the supreme sovereignty of God and His ongoing work to bring His creation to its ultimate fruition in unity with Him."

However, before this, note also that Gianni said:

1. Human beings are literally stardust that were born and lived and died billions of years ago (324).

2. We are thus the reason for the creation's existence (324).

3. The end of creation and man is united and culminates in the "Omega Point," which is "the perfected, harmonious and joyful unity of all Creation in Him for the purpose of engaging in the ongoing creative activity of a redeemed and transformed universe -- forever." (325).

4. For the Creator the past is never lost because it can be reclaimed by weaving it into ultimate goodness so that even disasters of the greatest kind actually are used to achieve the purpose of creation. (325).

5. However, the Creator does not control the future, nor does He direct the interactions that produce the fabric of actuality that we know as reality. (326)

6. He does not because this would negate the purpose that humans were created for. (326).

7. Evidence of the past being able to be changed is found in ley-leaping and manipulating the past within the multiverse (327).

8. The future is not controlled in any way. Why? In the words of Gianni, "to control the future would impose a deterministic outcome on the created order, thereby destroying both the freedom and independence of the freely interacting creatures it is meant to produce and, likewise, negating the very purpose for which the future and even time itself was created!" 327

9. The future therefore exists "to allow the created order to achieve the highest expression of goodness, beauty, and truth, in harmonious and joyful unity with the Creator. And while the Creator intends our free and willing participation in the ongoing realisation of His desires, and aids us in bringing about His purposes, He does not control the results of our participation. We know this because the result the Creator desires -- that is, the active creation of new and higher forms and expressions of goodness, beauty, and truth -- is one of the primary reasons for our existence in the first place."

Point nine is supposed to be that grand moment of realization where all the characters in the story realize they can ruin the multiverse and indeed the Creator's very purpose for existence.


This is silly nonsense, really. You want to know what's impossible? God getting what He wants, in Gianni's world. Why? Because his God isn't actually supreme, isn't actually sovereign at all. Who is? Man. But that of course is what the cosmos is all about. This is a man-centered understanding of all things. God desired to have men create goodness, truth, beauty, but Gianni cannot envision a God that can actually get what He wants. So evil exists because man must have a free will. That's a weak justification for evil.

Well, the God of the Bible gets what He wants, and it is done by a deterministic worldview, yet it does no violence to the will of the creature. Let's consider Lawhead's book. Is Gianni really free? According to Gianni, no, because whether Gianni knows it or not, what he is saying and thinking has been predestined by Lawhead. But imagine if Lawhead could bring his book -- and world -- to life. Would Gianni be free? Yes, in the sense that Gianni would do exactly what he wanted to do. No, in the sense that Gianni could not do other than what he desired, or what was predestined by the creator, Mr. Lawhead.

So it is with the God of the Bible, except He spoke the world into actual existence (something no man can do). He planned the Fall, predestined it, along with everything else, including the damnation of the wicked. Consider Proverbs 16:4, "The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil."

Or consider Romans 9:10-24, which really makes clear Gianni's faulty belief system:
And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac 11 (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), 12 it was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.”[d] 13 As it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.”[e]
14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! 15 For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion.”[f] 16 So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. 17 For the Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.”[g] 18 Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.
19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?” 20 But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” 21 Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?
22 What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

Of course, history was made for Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Creation is the expression of the love between God the Father and God the Son, and God subjected the creation to futility so that His Son might be the hero of history and redeem it. The Father has given the Son preeminence over all things, and in fact all creation was made for Christ, not for man, as Colossians 1:15-20 plainly says:

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. 18 And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He may have the preeminence.
19 For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, 20 and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.
Gianni's god is impotent, weak, inferior, and cannot get what he wants. Our God, the God of the Bible, is all powerful, strong, and gets what He wants, which is glory for Himself. And He gives all the glory of man to His Son, and through union with the Son, we gain glory too. Our God is marvelous, He knows the end from the beginning because He has predestined the first from the last. Yet He does it all through the means of our willing. The truth is, predestination and human choosing are not contradictory. God is able to make His grand glory story, His epic novel, come to life, and we are characters in His story that do both exactly what we want and what He predestined, because they are one in the same.

Oh mystery of mysteries, praise be to our God!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true...

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many...