Skip to main content

For Secularists, Drug Addiction is the Devil's Fault



By: Thomas F. Booher

I was compelled to write this piece after reading this article by none other than Russell Brand. The reason I was compelled is this: he bemoans the death of Philip Seymour Hoffman and blames drug laws for making drug addicts seem immoral (drug addicts being victims of a disease that could "attack" anyone). Indeed, the subheading of his post claims that Hoffman is another victim of extremely stupid drug laws. 

Why are drug laws stupid? To quote Brand, "If drugs are illegal people who use drugs are criminals. We have set our moral compass on this erroneous premise, and we have strayed so far off course that the landscape we now inhabit provides us with no solutions and greatly increases the problem." 

Then Brand makes the wild assertion that those who make the drug laws are "deliberately creating the worst imaginable circumstances to maximise the harm caused by substance misuse." 

The war on drugs is politically motivated for Brand, and since data shows prohibition doesn't help at all but only makes matters worse, why don't we stop? Brand says because of tradition, prejudice, and extreme stupidity. 

He is not, however, judgmental of Hoffman or Justin Bieber. Why? Because he's the non-judgmental type? Obviously not. No, he is not judgmental because he, too, is a drug addict in recovery and knows what it's like. 

Brand then blames the Devil for the mental illness of drug addiction (and he knows this because he's been there). No, he didn't use the word "devil," but he blamed him just the same. He says in spite of the praise that comes with being a star, "there is a predominant voice in the mind of an addict that supersedes all reason and that voice wants you dead. This voice is the unrelenting echo of an unfulfillable void" (my highlights).

So then, the "disease" of addiction is the fault of those who make drug laws and the Devil. But it most assuredly is not Hoffman's fault. After all, if you are hearing voices, if they are speaking into your mind, then how can you be held accountable for that? 

Brand's solution? No drug laws, and an environment of support, tolerance, and understanding. 

You see, for Brand and so many other secularists out there, addiction really isn't your fault. You don't bring yourself into addiction. If there are abnormal blips on a brain scan that indicate you are addicted to something, then you aren't responsible. After all, you didn't put those blips there. It's just the naturalist's devil manifesting himself inside of your brain, possessing you and making you do irrational things. Stupid everyone else, how hard is it for you to understand that, we even have empirical evidence! 

So obviously we shouldn't judge Bieber or Hoffman; they aren't stupid, they are victims, and it's everyone else's fault. We are the idiots, stuck in our traditional understanding and trying to make those addicted to drugs suffer even more by considering them to be criminals. How dare we.

THIS is the face of tolerance, of support, of understanding. Anything less and YOU are the dumb, ignorant, and unloving one. 

But true love would be pointing to reality, and reality is that we aren't demon-possessed by brain dots. We give in to sin, which creates patterns of addictions, like a bad habit, evidenced by brain dots. Should we support the repentant? Absolutely, and we should help them, but they must understand that at root it is our sinfulness, meaning our own desires, that produces our addictions. 

But for Brand and so many others, my question is this: Where do you draw the line? How do you draw the line? Once God is out the door then who says what is and is not true? Well, the individual of course. And given man is bent toward wickedness, which any honest, "non-stupid" person can tell, Brand's belief system will result in the majority of people moving further into immorality, all the while screaming toleration and acceptance for one another (sound familiar?). 

And why will they scream for toleration? Because the majority, like Russell Brand, will have been there too. Someday the majority will be drug addicts. The majority will be sexually deviant, homosexuals, adulterers, rapists, and murderers. No, not someday. Not someday. If Jesus made one thing clear it's that we all are these things at heart already

So yes, I can sympathize with Russell Brand. Because I've been there too. I'm there right now. But by God's grace I haven't bought into the lie that my desires are not my sins but instead is the Devil in my brain.  

But for Brand and others, we must all tolerate each other because it's not really our fault, it's the Devil in our brain's fault. 

When society turns the corner and everyone is an addict, society can no longer be to blame since we are a society of addicts. We are all victims of this disease, this black plague, and it's causing us to hurt others and ourselves. But it surely isn't our fault, society will cry. We didn't choose to get involved with drugs, or rape, or theft, or murder. It was the dots on our brain, they just came out of nowhere! Those dots were telling us to do it, and we couldn't help but listen!  

God help us. May He cause the Spirit working through the proclamation of the gospel to conquer fallen wills, and demonic brain dots, for His glory. May we give true love, which is the Truth, that Christ is the only way to salvation, and that we are sinners enslaved to our own addictions, but we are willing slaves, slaves not just by nature, but by choice.      






 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

WHY OUR REFORMED DENOMINATIONS ARE DYING (or are already dead):

  By: Thomas F. Booher The short answer is the faithful Elders, as a class, failed to heed Paul's words to the Ephesian Elders in Acts 20:28-29, "Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears." False teachers rising from among the Eldership is not a surprise, it's a Scriptural promise. Hence Paul warns the Elders to keep watch, vigilantly, and take swift action. Nothing will poison churches, denominations, the Christian faith at large, worse than its leadership being run by savage wolves in sheep's clothing, by

Luke Chapters 1-8 Sermon Outlines

  Luke 1:1-4 – Luke’s Orderly Account of Jesus Christ -- Sermon Outline Intro: Christians need an inspired account of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ.     Need: Luke gives such an account in his gospel, so that we may know Jesus and have faith in Him. Theme: Luke compiles an account of the ministry of Jesus:   I.      Accurately declaring what the apostles and other eyewitnesses had told him. A.      1:1 , Inasmuch as many have taken in hand to set in order [put together/compose] a narrative [declaration/accounting/narration] of those things which have been fulfilled among us              1.       It is clear that what Christ had done did not go unnoticed, as “ many ” have undertaken the great task of composing in written form a historical “ narrative” concerning Christ’s earthly ministry.              2.       “ have been fulfilled ” means accomplished, and the perfect tense indicates the fulfilling of these OT prophecies concerning Christ, who He is and what