Skip to main content

The Value of Presuppositional Apologetics for Pastoral Ministry

By: Thomas F. Booher

Some may believe that a pastor’s inability to defend the faith is an unimportant issue. After all, is not a minister preaching to believers who are already convinced of Christianity? Indeed, he is, and this is precisely why the pastor must have a firm grasp of biblical apologetics. It is the pastor’s job to help equip the saints so that they are always ready “to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear” (1 Peter 3:15). The pastor himself must be well-versed in defending the faith, and he must know how to do it in a biblical manner, so as to teach and model apologetics for the congregation. Defending the faith well comes with benefits for both minster and congregation alike.
            Apologetics gives the minister greater confidence when he preaches the word because he knows that his faith is sure. Indeed, the great value and benefit of presuppositional apologetics is that it plainly shows the impossibility of the Christian faith not to be true. Such assurance not only gives the pastor boldness in the pulpit, but the demonstration of this truth also bolsters the faith of every believer in the pew. This apologetic method also reminds the pastor that he must take his stand for the Christian faith on the very Word of God itself, looking to it as the sole authority of infallible truth. Man’s fallible reason must submit to the revelation of God’s Word and conform to it. Such a view of apologetics keeps before the minister the reformed/biblical understanding of knowledge and epistemology. A person can know something only because God has revealed it and has given men minds to understand the world He has made. Apologetics demonstrates that mankind thinks God’s thoughts after Him, and is not the one coming up with the facts and meaning of anything. Fact and meaning always go together because it is God who determines each. You cannot understand one apart from the other. This coherency in the world on account of the revelation of God helps prevent ministers from sliding away from the authority of Scripture. Indeed, one cannot deny the inerrancy of Scripture without also denying the ability to defend the Christian world and life view. This holds ministers fast to God’s Word, and keeps before them (and their congregation) the supremacy of God over all things, especially how one understands anything that happens or exists in the world.
            Presuppositional apologetics also prohibits the minister from reasoning like an unbeliever with his congregation (or other unbelievers for that matter). He does not build the defense of the faith after a step-by-step, blockhouse approach, but rather presents before believer and unbeliever alike the full-orbed teaching and vision of the Christian faith. The minister presupposes God’s existence as necessary to rational thought itself, and never moves off that ground when engaging in apologetics. This may be more winsome and appealing for the believer, and it will also reveal up front just what it is that the unbeliever must believe and submit to in order to become a Christian. Such clarity and concreteness gets right to the heart of the issue between believer and unbeliever, namely, the yellow-tinted glasses that the unbeliever wears in order to interpret all things so as to suppress the truth of God in unrighteousness. This blunt clarity will also help the pastor depict the sharp divide between the believer and unbeliever for his own congregation, so that they can understand the true nature of fallen man better and be even more amazed by God’s saving grace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true...

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...

Ordered Loves, Inequalities, Supremacy, and "Racism"

 By: Thomas F. Booher  Today, being a white Christian man in the United States and holding to properly ordered loves (a good definition of which is given here:  https://americanreformer.org/2024/12/rightly-ordered-love/ )  consistently and publicly will get you labeled as a "racist" or "white supremacist" or something similar soon enough.  In fact, you do not even have to be white or a man to be labeled something like a "white supremacist". But there's a rule out there today that if you can't find a minority to say it first, then what you are saying is bigoted, racist, etc.  I like the phrase/terminology of "properly ordered loves" because it is harder to slander/bear false witness against. It is harder to reduce down to some sort of scary word like "racist" or "kinist" or "supremacist" or "nazi" or whatever. I would say I also like the notion of "family first", but apparently some have ev...