Skip to main content

Presbureaucrats: Or, when Parliamentary Procedure Promotes the Progressives

By: Thomas F. Booher 

There are conservative, confessional, parliament/BCO sticklers who know the "playbook" but not how the other side is thwarting their playbook with tricks. They fail to recognize that keeping the rules sometimes promote breaking the rules, that nefarious forces can twist upholding the letter of the law to destroy the spirit and actual intent of the law's letter. 


I'd argue this is why it is actually good in the PCA that overture 37 is not going to pass. I have just now come to that position, but knowing how slippery the liberals are, they'll take "racism" to mean "being white unrepentantly". Many of the conservatives would have considered overture 37 passing to be a great victory, but then there jaw would hit the floor when they see the liberals twisting it to their advantage, excluding white men from candidacy for the ministry in the PCA unless they repented in sackcloth and ashes for being white.
But that's what liberals do, they twist things, especially the true and good words. Like Satan. Do we understand that a Satanic spirit is at work in some of our pastors and elders in our Reformed denominations?
Probably the best analogy is not that the other team has outmaneuvered our playbook, but rather the enemy has our playbook and is now exploiting it, but cleverly so. They aren't making it obvious that they have our playbook. Just like when the opposing baseball team steals signs, they don't make it apparent that they are stealing signs the catcher is putting down. But they know which pitch is coming.
Likewise, conservatives are predictable. We run the same plays from the BCO playbook, the same way, without an inch of variance/flexibility of interpretation given the PLAYS run against us, and the fact that the other side has ceased to fight fair and in good faith. The self-appointed "umpires" thus always become the conservatives, since they actually care about rules. The liberals are glad to let the scrupulous conservative umpires fill that position, because they will break and bend the rules with reckless abandon.
Progressives know that conservatives are more squeamish to bend rules, or a better way of putting it than "bending", to read the room and what is happening and realize there has to be some built-in flexibility in our rules for the spirit of the law to uphold the letter of the law, especially when it is necessary to fight fire with fire.
But the conservative spirit is not fiery floor speeches and fighting fire with fire. It is fighting fire with parliamentary procedures, and the progressives have learned to turn parliamentary procedures into gasoline. Yet, we conservatives keep pouring on the gasoline, pleased that we stay above the fray and are doing things "decently and in order". But behold, doing things thus has now produced indecency and disorder, but we somehow keep missing that!
So conservatives often fight disorder and confusion with the same sort of weakness a father has when his five young children are spitting and yelling and screaming at each other over spilled milk, but the father is too righteous to yell as loud as he can over the fray and the fracas in order to restore order and bring down discipline. And why? Because he read in a good Reformed book on parenting that you must NEVER yell at your children. So the father pats himself on the back for never yelling (which in general, yes, you shouldn't yell), meanwhile the kids continue to descend the steps of hell as they exhibit all forms of greed, jealousy, anger, hatred, fratricide, eye-gouging, you name it.
Sometimes, the only way to restore order is to "break" the rules of decorum. Sometimes fashioning a chord of whips and turning over tables really is the only righteous solution.

As some others have pithily pointed out, "The Order of Worship has become the Worship of Order." May it be so no more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true...

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many...