Skip to main content

Covenant Babies at the Lord's Table?

Those who recognize children of believers belong to the covenant sometimes make the error of also admitting them to partake of the bread and the wine as infants, or at least babies. Even among paedocommunion advocates, there is a surprising amount of variety, some admitting to the table from birth, others waiting until anywhere between 1-3 years old, for various reasons, usually tied to physically being able to digest the bread/wine or being weaned from the mother's milk. 

But the Lord's Supper is a spiritual meal, requiring spiritual teeth, faith, to truly feed on Christ and be nourished at the table meal. So here is a brief reply I gave to some paedocommunion guys who charge paedobaptists like myself of being inconsistent and "excomunnicating" our covenant children from the Lord's Table: 

Infants and babies are always part of the family, and usually literally join at the dinner table/high chair around the table for family meals. They are not "unwelcome" at the family table. The table is for them. They are brought around it. But until they have the physical constitution to eat the meat, they don't. They drink their mother's milk, as they get older they also drink water, then soft foods, etc., are added. But there are a couple years usually before the child is expected and able to eat the full family meal (and often a year or two after where they have the food chopped up in tiny pieces), but all the while they are admitted to the family table.

Well, you can make the obvious application to the Lord's Table/Supper. Covenant children aren't excommunicated or "unwelcome" at the Table. If our congregation had a communion table where each covenant family would come to it/sit at it, we would not tell the parents to abandon their infants and babies in the pew, but rather bring them to the table. As soon as they can eat of this spiritual meal at the Lord's Table, that is, desire to and profess faith in Christ, so as to feed on Him by faith, they may do so. You can take physical/carnal feeding on Christ back to Rome. This is a spiritual meal, which requires a spiritual chewing that is symbolized in the physical chewing. It only takes child-like faith, but it does take faith to truly partake of Christ in the sacramental meal.

Just as the babies are encouraged to grow into maturity and eat the full meal at the family table that their older brothers and sisters are enjoying, so is the Lord's Supper a call to grow into spiritual maturity/faith. But that spiritual feeding comes by the moms and dads, along with the pastors/elders, feeding the milk of the Word to the children, nurturing them in the covenant so that God works by His Spirit with the word on their hearts to bring them to saving faith, and praise God, to not just sit at the Table of the Lord but to now feed on the same spiritual meal as their covenant family, the meal that they have been seated around as a member of, and now are able to devour with their spiritual teeth of faith that have come in by God's kindness. The meal, of course, is Christ Himself, and His efficacious death. His body broken and blood shed for that child. His body was given for our covenant children from their mother's womb, and now with the teeth of faith they come to the table to partake of His saving blessings. 

You do have the ditch in some Reformed churches where, to borrow from my analogy above, they don't merely wait for a child-like faith/spiritual teeth to come in, but mature faith/spiritual molars. So children who truly have faith to partake worthily and remember/proclaim the Lord's death for them are forbidden. This would be like barring your older children from eating steak because they don't yet have their molars, making them wait until they are teenagers or even college aged to eat a nice steak dinner. 

That would be frustrating, and so when a child is ready to profess faith in Christ and wants to come to the table, to refuse to do so because they don't have a mature faith with spiritual "wisdom teeth" is absurd, and can frustrate the faith of that child. So my position, and the elders position at our church, is "young credo-communion." At the time of writing this, 6 of our covenant children, ages 6-8, will make profession of faith this Lord's Day, and then in June will partake by faith, with their spiritual "baby/child" teeth as it were, of Christ in the bread and wine, and so be spiritually nourished, remembering and proclaiming the Lord's death for them and the whole Church body/family to which they belong, and have always belonged. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true faith, is

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many