Skip to main content

Why we Baptize by Sprinkling/Pouring not Immersion

 



Why Do We Baptize by Sprinkling/Pouring and not Immersion/Dunking?

1.       Ex. 24:8 Moses sprinkles people with blood of covenant.

a.       Mt. 26:28; Mk. 14:24; Lk. 22:20, Christ says He “pours out” His blood of the New Covenant.

b.       Heb. 9:19-20; 10:29 connect Moses to Christ, do not reject the blood of the new covenant by which you were sanctified, and thereby outrage the Spirit of grace.

2.       Ezek. 36:25-26 “I will sprinkle clean water on you.” Also says new hear and spirit is given, removes heart of stone. Compare this to the new covenant as promised in Jeremiah 31:31ff.

3.       Baptism does not mean “immersion”. It has a range of meaning of various washings/cleansings (you can bathe by taking a shower or a bath, sponge bath, etc.).

a.       Acts 8:38-39, Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch go down into the water, but only after this is the Ethiopian said to be baptized by Philip. They both then come up out of the water.

b.       If going in and coming out meant immersion, then not only was the Ethiopian immersed, so was Philip, the one doing the baptism! This is an absurd idea.

c.       Mk. 1:8-10, Jesus is baptized by John, going into and coming out of the water. Again, as seen from Acts 8 above, this does not mean He was immersed. It means he walked into the Jordan river. The Ethiopian’s baptism likely didn’t even have enough water to immerse his whole body.

4.       After Christ’s baptism, as He comes back to dry ground, the Spirit “descends” upon Him.

a.       John the Baptist says he baptizes with water, but Christ will baptize with the Holy Spirit. We see Christ is now baptized/full of the Holy Spirit, and will soon, after He ascends on High, baptize His people with the Holy Spirit, by pouring out His Spirit upon them.

b.       Acts 1-2, Apostles must wait for the Spirit to be “poured out” from Christ on high.

c.       Acts 1:5, Jesus says, “they will be baptized with H.S. soon.

d.       Acts 2:3, Holy Spirit comes upon/sits disciples/apostles like tongues of fire.

e.       Acts 8:14-16, H.S. had not yet “fallen” upon the Samaritans.

f.        Acts 10:44, Peter is preaching and the H.S. “falls upon” the Gentiles. The Jews are astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit is “poured out” also on the Gentiles.

5.       Peter then says in Acts 10:47-48, “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.

a.       We see baptism in the new covenant/for us today is deeply connected to the blood of Christ and its sprinkling/pouring out. And because Christ’s blood cleanses/covers His people, it is a baptism that can also symbolize the Holy Spirit’s outpouring/being received by God’s people.

b.       Christ’s blood cleanses us, and makes us fit to receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

c.       So baptism symbolizes Christ’s blood and Spirit. So how does His blood and Spirit come upon us? Plainly, Scripture shows it is by pouring or sprinkling, not immersing or dunking!

d.       This shows the Lord is sovereign in covenanting and redeeming His people. He is the one who covers us with Christ’s blood, and pours out His Spirit upon His people.

e.       But in immersion, the water, which is meant to symbolize the blood and Spirit of Christ, is passive, and the person is active. While this might be said to symbolize burial with Christ and rising to new life akin to Romans 6, this is not the focus of the Scriptures on baptism’s meaning.

f.        But since God is the initiator and the one who promises Christ’s blood and indwelling Spirit to His covenant people, we can see God’s sovereign grace, and that He can make this covenant and its promises of Christ’s blood and Spirit to whomever He wishes.

g.       Since God has always covenanted with believers and their children (Gen. 17:7; Acts 2:38-39), then babies of believers also ought to be baptized, and as the child grows in age, they should be taught that their baptism shows God has covenanted with them and promised them the blood of His Son and the Spirit of His Son, to be received savingly by faith and repentance.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true faith, is

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many