Skip to main content

Masculine Christianity Book Outlines: Intro and Chapter 1

 

Masculine Christianity (by Zachary Garris) Chapter Outlines

Introduction & Chapter 1

1.      Why this book?

a.       Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood by John Piper and Wayne Grudem is helpful but it is a large collection of essays that lacks cohesion, etc.

b.       Further, the book deviates from some historic Christian views, as shown in Masc. Chris.

c.       Modern commentaries are feminist, ignore the issue, cast doubt on male headship, etc.

d.       Zach Garris will bridge the gap between popular level works and dry academics.

e.       Conservative academics are afraid to publish in this area, due to controversy [getting canceled], etc., and publishing companies are unwilling to publish on such issues.

f.        Masculine Christianity is an anti-Feminist and pro-Partriarchal book that engages the “Evangelical Feminists” of today. “Feminism is false teaching that distorts the Bible’s instructions for godly living” and therefore cannot be taken lightly.

g.       Garris’ key distinction in his book that goes beyond most complementarian works of today is the teaching “that male authority is rooted in the differing natures of men and women and that there is a hierarchy of rank (not value) between the sexes.” (page IX).

h.       This is where the Complementarian movement falls short, and as a result, it tends to pit church against society, where a woman is forbidden authoritative positions in church, but not in society. This is also fueling society’s sexual and gender confusion.

i.         Garris’ book is a critique of narrow complementarianism and advocates for a “comprehensive and consistent biblical view of men and women where men rule in the home, church, and society.”

j.         We must show the good for both men and women of the Bible’s hierarchical and Patriachal teachings, for it is in fact the cure for the world’s sexual chaos. Amen!

2.      Gender, Sex, and Masculine Christianity:

a.       “sex” is biologically determined, “gender” is its social expression (masculine vs. feminine).

b.       But this distinction is exploited now to say one can identify as a gender different from their sex. This is transgenderism. Garris will emphasize “gender roles” relating to males/females.

c.       “God has assigned different gender roles and duties to humans based on their biological sex…they are rooted in creation, not culture.” (xi).

d.       The book is titled Masculine Christianity because God is referred to in masculine terms (He, Him, Father, Son) and this is associated with strength, authority, responsibility, and mission.

e.       Thus God places men and not women in leadership, for God appointed men as kings, priests, and elders in the O.T., and now calls men to lead the church, home, and society.

f.        Christ took on male human flesh, He became a man, not a woman for all these reasons.

g.       Being feminine is virtuous and proper for a woman, but sinful effeminacy for a man.

3.      Survey of each Chapter in Masculine Christianity:

a.       Chap. 1: The rise of feminism and erosion of masculinity in the West.

b.       Chap. 2: Call to repentance from sexual rebellion, including/especially feminism.

c.       Chap. 3: How complementarianism is the church’s response to feminism, but compromised.

d.       Chap. 4: Christianity is thoroughly Patriarchal.

e.       Chap. 5-6: Gender roles and male rule are rooted in the creation order.

f.        Chap. 7-11: Masculine authority and rule in the home (7), church (8-10), & society (11).

g.       Chap. 12: Call for men to leave a godly legacy by loving and leading their families, raising godly children, and building for the future.

4.      Chapter 1: The Rise of Feminism and the Erosion of Masculinity:

a.       Rather than aiding men as wives and mothers, women are competing with men in jobs, academics, etc. Marriages are in shambles and many men have decided to forgo marriage.

b.       When men are weak, the world is weak. Women are left vulnerable, children unloved, etc.

c.       “The decline of men has coincided with the rise of the welfare state, as civil government seeks to provide financial assistance” (2) filling the role of the father.

d.       This system is abused, rewards bad behavior, and usurps church’s diaconal role.

5.      Feminism’s War on the Family:

a.       “Feminism is the belief that men and women are fundamentally the same and thus interchangeable.” Diminishes sex distinctions, pushes women away from home/into careers.

b.       The goal is for women to hold equal political and economic power with men.

c.       All branches of feminism unite in the conviction that women can only find purpose in career.

d.       F. Carolyn Graglia (author who left lawyer career to become a homemaker): “Feminism has actively sought the traditional family’s destruction”.

e.       Graglia: Feminism holds that equality means sameness (men and women must do the same things) and that most differences between men and women are imposed by culture.

f.        Garris’ challenges both assumptions, showing “equality” should mean men and women each have “equal value” before God and man, not equal functions, and that men and women have different natures rooted in God’s design, not culture. (page 4).

6.       Waves of Feminism: 1st wave (1830’s-1920’s); 2nd wave (1960’s-90’s); 3rd wave (1990’s-present):

a.       Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) & Elizabeth Stanton (1815-1902) led 1st wave, sought economic, political, social equality of women with men. Political goal=women’s right to vote.

b.       Urged equal wages, property rights, marriage rights, social causes against slavery/alcohol.

c.       With 19th Amendment in 1920 women were given federal right to vote. Was this good?

d.       Feminism is a revolutionary movement, urged abolitionism rather than gradual emancipation of slaves, stoking Civil War (1861-65), and Prohibition of alcohol, 1920-1933.

e.       This emerged primarily from the North, e.g., 10 southern states opposed women voting.

f.        Further, only some but not all women wanted the vote, so men thrust upon women the duty to vote. This placed upon women duties outside the home, leading to more waves of feminism.

g.       Theologian B.B. Warfield (1851-1921) said feminism viewed the individual rather than the family as the basic unit of society. “To [Apostle] Paul, the human race is made up of families… to the feminist movement the human race is made up of individuals; a woman is just another individual by the side of the man.” (page 7). Family was the first government and men, as heads of households, alone had the duty to participate in the civil sphere.

h.       Garris notes that 1st wave feminism setup the others, and is also wrong, stemming from the radical wing of the Enlightenment, the Jacobins, which carried out the Reign of Terror in 1793-4 of the French Revolution. The British/American view of equality meant equal treatment under the law, but for the Jacobins it meant sameness.  They were egalitarians, tearing down hierarchy and role differences, which was applied by feminists to gender roles.

i.         Egalitarians despise authority and thus reject hierarchy. Christianity affirms God’s authority over all creation, and thus affirms hierarchy, with authority structures in place on earth: Husbands in home, parents over children, elders over church, civil officials over citizens.

j.         Jacobin equality led to Quakers and other heretics, like Unitarians, rejecting Trinity/diversity.

k.       Stanton became an atheist and attacked biblical gender roles, Anthony was a Quaker (first to allow women preachers) and possibly became a Unitarian later in life.

l.         Flowing from this, the late 19th century saw women start 2 false churches/cults, Seventh Day Adventism (Ellen Gould White) and Christian Science (Mary Baker Eddy).

m.     Stanton wrote, urging for women in the ministry and other public affairs in the church.

n.       She was also a forerunner of no-fault divorce, saying only “love” should hold marriage together.

o.       Stanton even published The Woman’s Bible which dismissed whatever passages she and her committee considered unfavorable towards women, said Bible taught evil things, etc.

p.       Anna Howard Shaw, first ordained woman in Methodist church, said women didn’t need protection/provision from men anymore. Women can protect themselves now. She wanted women to get to serve in political office, serve as police officers, fight in military combat.

7.      2nd wave Feminism and the Sexual Revolution:

a.       Fought for women’s right to initiate divorce, no-fault divorce, right to abortion, equal wages.

b.       The invention of the birth control pill in 1950 helped set off this 2nd wave. Now women could have sex with many men without consequences.

c.       “When sex and children could be disconnected, traditional roles could be discarded. Women were freed to have sex apart from marriage and jobs apart from children. Enter the modern world” (p. 17). 1st wave = independent from men; 2nd wave = women can act like men.

d.       Women traded home and raising children for careers more and more, birth rate plummeted, children were raised by other people than their parents increasingly.

e.       Feminism was greatly aided by the Industrial Revolution and technological advancement.

f.        Industrialization from 1780-1830 broke the bond of work and home, where the entire family worked to support the family business and husbands were more involved with childcare.

g.       Men were driven out to work in factories, grocery and retail stores made work for women at home much easier/quicker. It was now possible for women to leave the home for long hours.

h.       3rd wave feminism is more eclectic, but focuses on pushing for homosexuality and sexuality as a means of empowerment (18), enshrined in 2015 Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage in all 50 states (Obergefell), and 2020 anti-discrimination laws to homosexuality and transgenderism (Bostock v. Clayton County).

i.         R.J. Rushdoony: “Religion is seen as a projection of the family, and the family must therefore be destroyed in order that religion may be destroyed.” This is what Feminists have aimed to do.

8.       Feminism Ingrained in Our Laws:

a.       This leveling of our laws between men and women has harmed men and women.

b.       For example, many states have abolished the common law requirement for a husband to provide for his wife and children. No fault divorce is now law in every state, and either a man or woman can commit adultery, then initiate divorce and take 50% of the marital property, including splitting child custody and parenting time.

c.       It is now illegal to pay women less to do the same job a man does, even though women are often less efficient. Women now compete with breadwinner jobs, further eroding our national birthrate and making it harder for a man to be the sole income provider for the home.

d.       Statism/government has displaced fathers, providing needs from cradle to grave.

e.       Laws financially incentivize women to have sex/babies out of wedlock.

9.       Feminism Infecting the Church:

a.       Gender role debates exploded in the 1980’s in the Church, the CBMW/complementarians opposed to the CBE, Christians for Biblical Equality.

b.       Many Protestant Churches are functionally Egalitarian, if not outright so in doctrine.

c.       Many church women pursue careers (and take on debts) instead of children and homemaking. Yet they still want to marry a man who makes more money than them.

d.       Feminism is the twisted idea that a woman is free when serving an employer but a slave when serving her family” (page 24).

e.       Our churches are feminist and as such weak and impotent, trading its masculine calling for effeminacy. It has left God’s design and now cannot live out God’s calling to lead the world!

f.        No wonder even in the church we have homosexuality and transgenderism rampant.

g.       “What we are dealing with is the triumph of progressivism. The political and social left rules the West, and its evangelists have infiltrated the Church.”  

h.       Evangelicalism itself is compromised and too weak and soft to fend off the onslaught. “The effeminacy of the Church explains why so many Christians have embraced leftist views.”

i.         “The feminist movement as a whole is a rebellion against historic Christian society and its authority structures. Yet the church has embraced its very enemy. Feminism is no longer just an enemy without, but also an enemy within.” Individual vs. family, egalitarian vs. hierarchy.

j.         Garris argues it is women in particular who are not following their natural role and bear much blame for this, but men bear the ultimate responsibility for allowing this to happen.

k.       Christian men have failed to respond biblically, and have been passive and effeminate, while women have been misled by bad actors who have left us with an effeminate church.

l.         Christian fathers and pastors have allowed their daughters to go the way of the world rather than train them to seek children and domesticity. Pastors fail to address this sin in church.

m.     We are facing a crisis of masculinity in the church, and to recover it we must start with God the Father, with worship, for Christianity “has a masculine message of a husband who lad down His life for His bride” (27).

n.       Dabney predicted in 1871 that feminism “will destroy Christianity and civilization in America.”

o.       Repentance should have happened 100 years ago, and things are very bad now. So repent!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true faith, is

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many