Here are two posts I
made recently that are resonating with Christians in the Evangelical/Reformed
World. I wanted to share it here for further reach. Above is a video I made in light of my posts below. May God use it for His
glory.
*The references I make
to "negative world" are important to understand, and come from this
article.:
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2022/02/the-three-worlds-of-evangelicalism
Here is a brief
explanation from the article: "Within the story of American
secularization, there have been three distinct stages:
- Positive World (Pre-1994):
Society at large retains a mostly positive view of
Christianity. To be known as a good, churchgoing man remains part of being
an upstanding citizen. Publicly being a Christian is a status-enhancer.
Christian moral norms are the basic moral norms of society and violating
them can bring negative consequences.
- Neutral World (1994–2014):
Society takes a neutral stance toward Christianity.
Christianity no longer has privileged status but is not disfavored. Being
publicly known as a Christian has neither a positive nor a negative impact
on one’s social status. Christianity is a valid option within a pluralistic
public square. Christian moral norms retain some residual effect.
- Negative World (2014–Present):
Society has come to have a negative view of Christianity.
Being known as a Christian is a social negative, particularly in the elite
domains of society. Christian morality is expressly repudiated and seen
as a threat to the public good and the new public moral order. Subscribing
to Christian moral views or violating the secular moral order brings
negative consequences."
THREAD: Here's
why people hate Wolfe. Many of us (under 35-40) entered into
Calvinistic/Reformed thinking through popularizers on YouTube, etc., like James
White. I remember in 2008 learning the "5 points" but struggling on
Limited Atonement, until a helpful article by White.
A lot of people,
I think, got sucked into a particular stream, whether it's James White's
A&O ministry, and its small constellation of friends. White and others make
a lot of dogmatic statements, and to those knew to all this, who are we to
question? We have no traction yet.
Add to it our
nation and churches are going belly up, and you finally find some footing with
some of these guys. You embrace the sovereignty of God in salvation. True, some
stop there, go on and on for decades about the 5 points and think it's the sum
total of Reformed Thought.
Or some
meandered their way to Banner of Truth, maybe even find a confessional church
to worship in/at (but let's be honest, many of even some prominent "based
baptists" on Twitter, etc., aren't really at Confessional churches), and
their horizons are broadened a bit. But...
Everyone has an
angle, everyone is trying to make money, gain popularity and control the
narrative on what is or isn't Reformed. That especially happens even in
Reformed/Presbyterian old, stodgy Confessional churches.
@presbycast/@RScottClark types can abound in some circles.
As we entered
negative world, as @aaron_renn's article puts it, the poo hit the fan hard, and
keeps hitting the fan to this day, and all the fissures are and divides are
splitting open, wider and wider. Whatever recovery of
doctrine/thought/worldview we had was insufficient.
I remember
nodding in perfect agreement with men like Carl Trueman a decade ago or more,
when they basically said we love the Reformed, except their political
theology/ideology, etc. We've learned from that, overcome those blind spots.
All while the USA was imploding politically!
have a
Bachelor's degree from Sproul's Bible college and learned outside of the
theonomic, presuppositional bubble. Then I went to GPTS where that was very
prevalent a decade ago, though I think that's changing. But I also learned to
appreciate certain strands of theonomy.
As a pastor, I
have some at my church who are wrestling with covenant baptism, and I have to
push back on someone like White who apparently says things like John Calvin
invented infant/Covenant baptism. Paul Washer has said infant baptism was the
golden calf of the reformation.
You look at
Ligonier conferences, and everyone is singing Koombaya, Baptists and
Presbyterians at least. Michael Horton is there along with Al Mohler or Ligon
Duncan, etc. "What's the big deal" is the trickle down effect to the
person on the pew, who doesn't go beyond Ligonier.
What they won't
hear about, usually, is that Ligonier will quietly dismiss certain people that
go beyond their polls of acceptability, at least for a few years. Al Mohler,
for example, is no longer a teaching fellow, but that stuff is never broadcast,
but....
It is footnoted
at the bottom of an article now some 8 years old:
Few see this, so there's always suspicions but never real confirmations, only
obfuscations.
But enough of us have seen these games and the political posturing up close,
& its bad effects.
Welcoming Dr. R. Albert Mohler
Jr. and Dr. Derek W.H. Thomas as Our Newest Teaching FellowsDr. R.C. Sproul founded Ligonier Ministries in 1971 as a
teaching fellowship designed to flood the culture with knowledgeable and
articulate Christians. Since thttps://www.ligonier.org/posts/welcoming-albert-mohler-derek-thomas-newest-teaching-fellows
I really don't
know if Sproul would be quite the ally we think he would be in 2023. He died in
2017. He'd do better I believe than most everyone else with prominence, but I
don't think he'd be the rock star we quite hoped for. His legacy was built in
positive and neutral world.
But to get back
to the point of why folks hate @PerfInjust for posts like the one he made about
James White. People get strong emotional attachments, especially to
charismatic, dogmatic voices who truly helped you when you came to faith, or at
least came to Calvinistic conviction
Many never swim
outside of their narrow stream they were brought into, and James White, and a
whole hose of others, themselves likely came into these things in a narrow
stream, truncated view, etc., and started making some dogmatic assertions for
decades that went unchallenged.
You don't know
what you don't know, & I think it is plain that Reformed resourcement is a
moving target; I don't fully trust any sinner to not put their spin or bias on
it. As Wolfe and others have said, you need to "do the reading" for
yourself. But check the translation/edits!
If you read or
listen to the popular books and podcasts, they can be helpful, but they are
downstream, and through more lenses of interpretation, biases, etc. I have
found good theonomists, and good C2K, and gladly admit I am ignorant of the
depths of both. I must read more.
But I don't get
bent out of shape when Wolfe or others push back hard against this or that,
call this or that garbage, etc. they've got skin in the game, and frankly, it
is hard to deny that Wolfe, etc., are recovering and articulating much of what
the Reformers held.
So if James
White, R.C. Sproul, etc., is your hero, popularizer, read outside that stream,
realize no one person has the monopoly on all truth/learning, & that we've
been so far gone in the 20/21st century, White, etc., couldn't have put all the
pieces back together themselves.
And yes, we must
throw Doug Wilson and others into this as well. With all of these men and
movements and groups, we need to not throw the baby out with the bathwater. For
some of them, they may speak very dogmatically and simply be wrong or off a
bit. There's battles to fight.
The best heroes
are dead heroes, and ones that you are fairly sure you've not just been reading
a bunch of hagiography about. Because they can't disappoint you any longer, and
you should see they had their own faults in life as well. There are no impeccable
men to admire.
This isn't to
say you won't, with wide and careful study, narrow in or close on particular
convictions. I am a Reformed Presbyterian, still learning, but believe strongly
in covenant baptism, recognize paedo-communion is an absolute aberration, but
also am fond of Wilson's works.
I call myself
optimistic amill when someone forces me to "declare" what I am, have
appreciation for theonomist types and C2K types, but also know the best on both
sides could argue their positions better than I could for them, and both sides
have dolts.
The problem is
when people have been blindly zealous and dolts for over a decade, and I've
seen some of them on Facebook for more than a decade, share the same basic 5
pointer-isms that are shibolleths with little power to do us good at this stage
in the decay. Wolfe is hated by
PerfInjust A lot
of people like this, because it's been easy and comfortable to feel, and likely
be, more sound and learned in doctrine and the church than 97% of Christians in
our brain-dead and apostatizing nation. But go back 150 years or so, and even
as I a pastor would be middle class.
Lack of study or
honing in on one or two men or ministries, and giving blind allegiance to them,
is sin. Doing that for decades leads to hating men who know and teach better
than your heroes, who border on idols. This could be true for some
"Wolfe-ites" that form in years ahead.
So in short, can
you stomach someone calling your heroes and theological movements of the 20th
century "garbage", even if not all of it is equally garbage? Or does
that so upset you that you just jump in with calling Wolfe, well, a wolf in
sheep's clothing? That's the test.
PerfInjust It
really shouldn't be a hard test. But for so many it is, especially with the
rules of speaking niceties and pleasantries and disagreeing as gently and
agreeably and disguisedly as possible. How about we just study, learn, pray,
and plow ahead in service to the Lord? /end
One last note, I
never had the antipathy to natural law so many presup/theonomic types have/had,
but some are moderate on those points and seem solid enough overall to me.
Others are wrong and obnoxious. I'm not big on Van Til overall or the "how
do you know that" mantra.
THREAD: Will our
living, Reformed heroes fully betray us?
Yesterday's post has gotten a lot of response, so I thought I'd say some more.
Some are choosing to double and triple down in support of their old Reformed
heroes from the last few decades, as said heroes double down.
Many have been
molded into a narrow stream of thought, but believe it is rich fullness because
it has the label "Calvinist" or "Reformed" slapped onto it,
and their own churches aren't confessional, or are confessional in name only, and
lack the full, richness as well.
I am still
thankful for ministries like James White, Doug Wilson, R.C. Sproul/Ligonier,
etc. Even John MacArthur's or John Piper's were both influential on me early,
and brought many Christians into a better pipeline/thinking. But not without
its own baggage in negative world.
I never really
was much involved with G3, as that arose really after I was licensed/ordained
as a confessional Reformed Presbyterian. In the very early days, I was a junkie
for Wretched Radio/TV with Todd Friel. But I haven't watched that in over a
decade, and see its goofiness.
But Wretched did
used to show a lot of clips of other ministries that I was unaware of. I still
remember waking up early to watch Sproul on NRBTV, his classical apologetics
series, etc. Good, blissful times of learning. I told my father, an Elder in
our church, I found support.
Meaning, in the
wilderness & madness of the Christian world, the Reformed/Calvinistic
churches were faithful, an oasis, that believed in the sovereign grace of God,
cared for its people, and wouldn't betray you but would support you and
minister to you. That honeymoon was brief.
I went to
Covenant College, the College of the PCA, in 2009. When I say I
"attended" I mean I lasted all of about 10 days. It was horrible.
From the exuberant tuition (over $30,000/year I believe), to the low-class RA's
lusting to incoming freshman about hot female students, to..
our dorms
flooding & my roommate having nothing whatsoever to do with
Calvinstic/Reformed faith, but was there because his coach found him a place to
play basketball. Nothing personal against him, I can't even remember his name,
but he was just a black man looking to play ball.
I was looking
for something like a Bible College, to be fair, & Covenant College wasn't
that, but it hardly seemed Christian. Just a bunch of wealthy PCA kids who
lived near Lookout Mountain, but had long lost any heart for the Lord and the
faith. There were exceptions of course.
The icebreaker
for me, after getting the flu from our flooded dorm, was my first day of
psychology class, and the professor says his male friend was a hero for
marrying a woman and only occasionally cheating on her with other men! I spoke
up, and after class a student thanked me.
I'm not
misremembering this by the way, if you go to the old BaylyBlog website, back in
2009 or 2010 or so, I first explained these things on there. Even there, as I
recall, and elsewhere, I was told no Christian college could remain faithful
today and fund itself/survive.
I was told
looking for a faithful, Christian college was a pipe dream, almost sinful, and
what I should do is find a faithful Reformed Church and go to a secular
college, etc., that only really in seminaries would you find faithfulness. Boy,
they were wrong about that too!
Before Covenant
College, I had interest in pastoral ministry, but because I believed the
Reformed world and thus the church was in "good hands", I went to
Covenant College to major I believe in Journalism, or English, or something
like that. I wanted to be a writer, teacher, etc.
I was going to
minor in theology and was told I could transfer credits to Covenant Seminary.
So, I was undecided, but after having the smoke blown away and seeing the
hypocrisy in high places in the Reformed world, the Lord used that to convict
me to pursue pastoral ministry.
So I, like many
others in many different denominations/Christian colleges & seminaries,
etc., have seen things that are atrocious going back decades, and how so much
is built upon a lie and deception. The PCA and even the most conservative men
in there initially ignored Revoice.
So then I went
to Reformation Bible College, Sproul's College, in 2011, transferred 2 years of
credits in, finished up in 2 years, married my wonderful wife Jocelyn, and
we've had 7 kids in 10 years of marriage. Best oasis and period of my life were
those few years in Florida.
But there too,
sadly, a lot of the grandeur & glory was blown away, even from what I alone
saw, and then what my wife revealed to me, having worshiped at St. Andrew's for
many years, her father being on staff, etc., I was more disheartened. (It wasn't
Covenant College level bad).
I was actually
initially told by some in high places at RBC, Ligonier/St. Andrew's, etc., not
to go to GPTS, even though I distinctly recall GPTS being one of the first
blurbs of support for RBC when it was forming in 2011. I am told the tune has
changed at RBC, but it's funny...
How divided
these groups really are, when you get a little bit on the inside, and people
talk to you, thinking you are just young and impressionable, which I was, and
won't notice the duplicity, etc. I was told those who graduate from GPTS can't
get jobs pastoring/preaching.
I did have 1
professor strongly encourage me to go, & I am glad he did. Funny enough, he
is a professor at GPTS now, when he was at RBC. The schools have a stronger
relationship now, in truth, though it was made to appear that way all along.
Hire & fire "business" is prevalent.
Fast forward a
bit, I am back in NC, serving at the PCA church I grow up in. We go to
presbytery, and all the effeminate Elders (most of them) are not sure what to
do with practicing homosexuals who, let's say, came from a PCUSA church and
just have a "blind spot" on this issue.
I as a Ruling
Elder am the first & one of the only ones to speak up against this, along
with my father, also an RE, and our pastor at the time, maybe 1 or 2 others at
a table of 20+ Elders. We are patted on our heads as country folk who don't
know the challenges of city ministry.
Then when these
presbytery men found out I had written against pastors preaching in skinny
jeans, they revoked my approval to come under care, said I was binding the
conscience, etc. Even when I told prominent conservative men in the PCA, they
had sympathy for me, but no help.
I believed the
PCA was toast, really back in 2009 at Covenant College, but that conviction was
fully realized (good eschatology joke somewhere here) by 2015 or so and what I
was seeing in presbytery, and frankly at the local PCA church I served as an RE
in. Compromise & cowardice.
I realized, even
then, I would have to sear my conscience, become a PCA/NAPARC company man,
blind my eyes to the duplicity, compromise, etc., to maybe get in good with the
right people and land a comfortable job, in a church likely with people who
don't really want to be fed.
That wasn't
going to happen, by God's grace, I had resolved that. I had a young family,
little money, and what support I had at my local PCA church I grew up in had
dried up as well, where I served as an RE. SO my family along with a few others
went to a much better PCA church.
That church is
facing rocky times now, and was even when I first came there, as they, too,
hated that I would seek licensure in another, micro-denomination, while
attending their PCA and interning there. The pastor, a godly man, had me come
with him to their presbytery meeting...
This was when
Howard Brown, one of the few black ministers in Central Carolina Presbytery,
hosted the meeting & preached a white guilt sermon, I think from Rev. 5 or
6, and said "Why is the PCA so white?" And all the white ministers,
RTS-Charlotte bigshots, etc., Amen'ed it all.
My pastor
apologized to me and said this was the worst meeting he had ever been to. He
was formerly in the SBC and became Reformed/Presbyterian, and seeing how bad
the SBC is, anything better was like the golden land for him. I think many
others have felt similarly.
But even the
RE's wanted the name brand "glory" of PCA, argued that could bring in
more people to the church, etc. It's all a sick system, and if you cross it,
especially publicly, some sort of heresy charges or character charges will
absolutely be leveled against you at local..
and presbytery
levels. Possibly even publicly, even though you are never allowed to publicly
notice and state the garbage.
So to the point -- Will our legacy Reformed heroes & ministries, still
living and active, totally betray us, as the denominations and local churches
have?
Some of these
ministries, thankfully, have spoken "outside the box" and crab barrel
to give a hint of exposure to the issues. James White's ministry has done that.
I thought he handled the Mohler/Phil Johnson blow up well on one of his
dividing lines, one of the few I've watched.
But now that we
are in negative world, and things we didn't see, or didn't make a big stink
about, that now are absolutely crucial and should have been addressed while
still in neutral world, are biting us in the butt. So we have to look at our
heroes of neutral world, and judge.
We have to say
thank you, but there are things you missed, and you've built up your ministry,
reputation with many people, etc., and now that you are receiving criticism
from some of your own, will you, too, betray us, and bite and devour us for
seeing the speck in your eye?
When I look at
how @PerfInjust or White Boy Summer, etc., has been viciously attacked and
misrepresented, even if some things in WBS I, too, initially didn't like, and
still would differ on, I had no legacy and built up ministry that required me
to see the speck long in my eye.
I may well have
had a blind spot, or speck/error needing correcting, and to see more clearly
the glory of nations, God's purpose for them, the need to maintain them as part
of what is naturally good and good for the sake of the kingdom of God, grace
restoring nature, etc. But...
For me to grant
as much wasn't costly. I hadn't spoken against those things for decades, and
amassed a following based on incomplete or misinformation or some things that
were at least slightly off. I never bought into presupp or the worst forms of
theonomic #datpostmill cringe.
So when a better
game came to town, a more biblical, Reformed resourcement, argued carefully
& something I was familiar with from personal studies & college and
seminary education, which few had because even in so-called
"Calvinistic/Reformed" institutions they don't teach it...
I could receive
it with arms wide open, but also not uncritically, because I really don't have
the same sort of skin in the game. I do in the sense that all these things
reach the people in the pews I myself pastor, and so I have to work through
these things, but many pastors...
Instead of
"doing the reading" just parrot these things that are popular, and
whatever retains or draws in and rides the wave of the latest viewpoint, to get
them in their churches. I have to say it, but it sure seems @ostrachan does
this on a large scale, with a seminary, etc.
So to wrap this up, our Reformed heroes have
choices to make, to either be faithful to God's Word and adjust to both conform
to what is reasonable, natural, and biblical when they've been long in error,
even if only slightly but causing damage in negative world, or defend
their..
...errors
instead of humbling themselves, being grateful for greater clarity, and moving
forward in righteousness accordingly. I guarantee you, if someone did that
sincerely, who had real prominence, he wouldn't lose his platform, his
ministry, but God would triple it hastily.
It would signal
to me real reformation and revival, if we want to put it like that, was coming,
because prominent, godly men with massive ministries displayed publicly
humility, rather than public pride that makes them not think straight and
rebuke the good teachers & Christians.
I think
increasingly God is opening the eyes of those in the pew to all this hypocrisy.
Some are still holding on to their old heroes, even as their heroes compromise
further the truth out of pride, blindness, or whatever the case may be. But God
is turning things over.
We need to pray
for our leaders, but if they show themselves incorrigible and slanderous, and
increasingly willing to shoot down even their former supporters, we need to
move on, even to some extent with our efforts in our prayers. Time and energy
is short. Labor faithfully.
The charade will
not be able to continue much longer, as the faithful keep pushing and holding
others to account, and being willing to be corrected and held to account as
well. There will be more splintering, but God must cut down the postwar
consensus and Big/Mid Eva to dust...
to raise up
something more faithful, vibrant, battle hardened and battle ready for negative
world.
To get to woke world, our churches had to be utterly leavened with unrighteous
leaven as well. It was foolish of me to think somehow that leaven hadn't come
to the Reformed.
We must remember
that King David and Solomon did great wickedness, despite much good and reform.
Today, we must own that we had no thorough-going reformers, heroes of the
faith. Even the best left some high places for the wicked that were not taken
away....
Realizing that,
admitting that, is half the battle. The other half is acting in faith, seeking
to tear down those high places, or better if you are not a King/ruler in our
nation or Pastor/Elder in our church, to urge those leaders to be thorough
Reformers, or vote with your feet
Run for office,
in church or state, yourself if you are a godly man. More crucially, and of
first calling and importance, get married, have children, raise them for the
Lord. If you've messed up here, reform your own life there, and quite fighting
battles online! Do your duty.
But in closing,
we need to have the policy of No More Heroes. No heroes. No King but Christ.
That's not an anti-political statement. Many things that are wicked must be
torn down, chopped down with an ax even, inside & outside the church, &
much must be built simultaneously. /end
Comments
Post a Comment