Skip to main content

365 Days of Male and Female Piety

365 Days of Male and Female Piety

                What is male and female piety? What is true, godly masculinity and femininity? How is virtue cultivated in men and women? Even pagans and unbelievers have had a sense of piety, or pietas in Latin. For the Romans, this focused on loyalty and duty toward the gods, country, and family, especially toward the household and parents. In 1 Timothy 5:4 we are commanded to “show piety at home” by honoring the widows in our family and meeting their needs rather than burdening the church with alleviating the needs of widows. The Apostle Paul’s writings in the Bible often refer to distinct duties in the home and family for male and female, for the husband and father as well as the wife and mother (Ephesians 5:22-6:9 is just one of many places where Paul addresses these matters). This piety must go beyond the immediate household to more extended family, and Paul even indicates a particular love and loyalty to his kinsmen and nation of Israel (Romans 9:3-4; 10:1; 11:14). This book focuses on what some have called sexed or gendered piety, that is, the piety proper to men as males or masculine, and to women as females or feminine. Such male and female piety will be applied to the realms of the home (including marriage and children but also more extended family), church (the distinct callings, positions, duties, and behavior of men and women in the corporate worship services and general life and fellowship of the congregation), and society (to include many things from employment, industry, commerce, business, medicine, technology, politics, government, social clubs, education and academia, the military, etc.) . Cultivating gendered or sexed piety and virtue in each arena of life is essential, but today we have flattened out manhood and womanhood and reduced them to hardly distinguishable roles rather than distinct sexes that touch upon our very beings, and in that sense, our very natures as either male or female image bearers of God.   

But first, let’s consider how we have strayed from the true, biblical path and have horribly inverted God’s purpose and design for the male and female sex. Both church and society have largely followed the world into what can be called a feministic egalitarianism. In other words, the sensibilities of the female sex are now meant to rule over the home, church, and government. This is our culture’s egalitarian impulse, which pervades every sphere of life in the name of “equality” or “fairness”. The quiet (or not so quiet) assumption is that women have been suppressed for too long, their voices unheard, their faces unseen in the public square, and thus (it is wrongly alleged) their influence non-existent in the course of human history. History has been too brutal and bloody without women having at least an equal share of leadership, influence, and opportunity. Here is a basic definition of Egalitarianism, from Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egalitarianism]:

1: a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs.

and

2: a social philosophy advocating the removal of inequalities among people.

[Merriam-Webster says that this word was first used in 1874.]

So, in the doctrine of feministic egalitarianism, it is safer when women balance out men and keep them in check, to “equalize” or balance the equation. Men must be civilized by women, and this is the real “help” that the Bible proclaims, “help” in which the woman in essence domesticates or moderates the man. Notice that this requires the male image bearer, as created by God, to be “defective” if not outright sinful prior to man’s fall into sin. Woman as helpmeet becomes woman the tamer of men, the only way the nations of the world will finally beat their swords into plowshares (Isa. 2:4). According to this novel doctrine, to promote true peace and harmony is to promote the compassion and agreeableness of the female sex writ large over all spheres of life and in every institution. Men perhaps can still be permitted to “lead”, provided they become soft and mild and agreeable, like women. Of course, the woman will have the final say on when man has achieved this cultured state of civility. While we should recognize that men are fallen sinners who have led in wicked and destructive ways many times throughout history, what has feministic egalitarianism produced over the last few generations or centuries? It has only led to female sympathies (which is productive in the home and family when governed by God’s Word) running afoul and ruining the public sphere. This is especially seen in toleration of wickedness and compassion for the evildoer who is too often viewed as simply a victim of his or her circumstances, mistreatment, or oppression. The LGBTQ+ insanity, abortion on demand, mandated diversity quota policies, and mass immigration of foreigners without even an expectation or requirement to assimilate (and no sympathy for the native citizenry and families that built and established their country for their posterity) are prime examples of the wicked fruit flowing from the Egalitarian impulse. What we desperately need today is the tender humility, modesty, devotion, and submission of the woman, and especially the wife. This truly helps the man in his calling, which also helps him rightly channel his energy and masculine vigor to productive ends (cf. 1 Pet. 3:1-7).

                But feminized egalitarianism has instead taught women to become checks on men and competitors with men, in turns striving to match yet also neuter masculine strength, piety, and virtue. It is certainly true that men are fallen, sinful, and that their natural male drive and dispositions can also run afoul and into excess. But God is not an Egalitarian. He has not ordained that men and women would equally share rule and authority in the home, church, or civil society. Headship is given to men in principle, and women are helpers to the men. God has not only called men and women to these distinct roles, but He has designed and equipped them, as male and female, to these distinct ends. While both man and woman equally share human nature and bear the image of God, they do so differently from one another as men and women, as male and female. Masculinity is intrinsic to men and femininity to women. In other words, men are better at being masculine, and women are better at being feminine, not only because they fulfill that role, but because that is what they are! Men are built by God for headship and women for helping and nurturing. Women are to be valued and cherished as helpers to men, “for man is not from woman, but woman from man. Nor was man created for the woman, but woman for the man” (1 Corinthians 11:8-9, NKJV). We should recover and honor these distinct glories of both the man and the woman. But feministic egalitarianism wants to flatten out the distinction between male and female, robbing both of their glory and God’s good design for each. A softened man and a hardened woman are both miserable creatures and make for a miserable marriage.

Men must exercise masculine, loving leadership, for this is God’s good design. God has given men the natural strength and resolve to lead under pressure. And yet, men have allowed or perhaps even are orchestrating our current state of sexual confusion. Many men today would rather abdicate their authority, or worse, rule behind the scenes in various institutions through hardened women and weakened men. Masculine strength and virtue, true male piety, must therefore be suppressed as a natural defect according to the schemes of these wicked men. Masculinity must be viewed as nothing other than the source of all our problems in war, violence, greed, squalor, and misery. God made women to tame the men, but man has refused to be tamed by woman, and using his brute strength has kept woman in second place between the sexes. This is the feminized, egalitarian presupposition or impulse that we are born into today and that is reinforced by men behind the curtain who profit from male weakness and female antagonism. Of course, now if you speak of only two sexes or two genders this itself is a hate crime! Female compassion has gone to seed so badly that a man (or woman) can mutilate his own flesh and declare himself a woman to the applause and agreement of many men and women, even with legal recognition in some cases.

                God’s created order, seen in nature, cannot be dissolved with the stroke of a pen, injection of hormones, or even with the cutting of a knife upon the private parts. These things tear the soul and sunder the conscience. The murder of the developing baby in the nurture of the mother’s womb not only takes the life of the baby but also tears the soul of the cruel mother. Apart from God’s saving grace, the murderous woman (and men who took part or passively permitted this murder) will be guilt-ridden and haunted for this great evil. As women are hardened against the fruit of their own womb, on the other side men are suppressed and told to sympathize with women who must carry their children. Men are taught to be guilty, or at least to feel indebted and under the woman, simply because she bears their children in her body! These distortions and mutilations of the body, mind, and soul are commonplace and contrary to both God’s word and created order. Sometimes women are pressured by the men in their lives to murder their babies, but the justification for baby murder is almost always aligned with feministic egalitarian arguments.

Men should express gratitude and thankfulness for godly, feminine women, and especially for wives and mothers. This is good and proper. But instead, men are often conditioned to feel guilty that they were planted in their mother’s womb or implanted their seed which became their child in the womb of their wife. Women are psychologized to view themselves as victims of brute men, or even if they are Christian men, women are still encouraged to hold over the heads of their husbands the burden of being a helper to their husband as well as his homemaker and child-bearer. Greatness, strength, courage, daring, and wisdom are all frowned upon as displays of pride, foolishness, dangerousness, and delusion in men. Greatness is not needed when feminine sensibilities are dominant and pitying women and the marginalized or weakened in society is paramount. Greatness is risky, liable to promote conflict and upset the status quo.

But have you noticed the status quo lately? The feministic managed decline of our countries begs for God’s natural order between male and female to rise from the ashes once again. The distinct glories of male and female as God’s image bearers (Gen. 1:26-27) is powerful and productive, especially when wedded to the grace of God found in Jesus Christ and the Christian faith. This is because, while man is fallen, Christ the last Man restores fallen humanity, male and female alike, to their true design and calling. Every sin can be cleansed through faith in Christ’s atoning death. The differing male and female natures and glories of men and women find their restoration and indeed their culmination through union with the risen Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. But even apart from redemption in Christ, the natural order between the sexes that God has established is better than the unnatural and perverse disorder that we see today. Fornication is a sin, but homosexual fornication is an abomination worthy of death. Men sinning through excessive masculinity is wicked and will send one to hell, but men sinning against their nature, emasculating themselves and becoming effeminate, is a sin not only against God and others, but themselves, and makes one twice a son of hell. The same for women who harden their natural tenderness and femininity, despising these gifts from God as worthless and weak.  

These are sins against nature, or sins against your own sex as male and female. They occur when men fail to be the loving leaders, protectors, and providers that God has created them to be, and when women refuse to help their husbands and submit to their loving rule and headship, choosing instead to strive to rule over men in general and their husbands in particular (Gen. 3:16). These are monstrosities not only in action, but against nature and the natural inclinations that even unbelievers and pagans still often possess by God’s kindness. It is as disgusting as a man wearing a dress, baking the cookies in a bonnet, and burping the baby out of a guilted conscience that thinks his duty is to “split 50/50” the domestic burden with his wife. This all should be seen as distasteful as a woman wearing a suit and tie and leading a company, government, and nation out of a sense of female empowerment, or a woman wearing fatigues with combat boots, going off to war to defend her country and lay down her life for it (and the men). But if you are like many today, you are offended or at least uncomfortable with what I said about women here, yet unbothered with the part concerning the men. That is because you, too, have been baptized into feministic egalitarianism from birth and have been catechized by it all your life. When this impulse is in full bloom, it yields a false religion, a heresy that demands the inversion or equalizing of God’s good design for male and female gendered piety. But search the Scriptures and your own conscience, for your very nature as male and female screams against these lies.

                Feminism and Egalitarianism can only exist on the back of masculine strength and virtue, which in prior generations and centuries conquered, settled, and cultivated lands. Great buildings, technology, infrastructure, political wisdom, felling of forests, paving of roads, putting down the evil of murderous men and treacherous hordes of ungodly men, all of this was and is still possible only through the strength, ingenuity, wisdom, and godliness of good and righteous men. Return to the Garden of Eden, and we see that from the beginning it was always this way and always meant to be this way. Eve, the woman, is a helpmeet to man, a homemaker and child-bearer and life-giver. That is a glorious calling, but society now teaches the female sex to betray her nature and glory as a woman to play at being a man. She has become man’s competitor and rebuker, rather than helper and lover. But it is not good for man to be alone, and what he needs is a helper, a lover, a comforter, not a pretended man in the home to fight and compete against. “Better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman” (Prov. 21:19). But unfaithful men make for lazy and stupid heads of homes, churches, and societies, which leave women helpless, directionless, and tempt them to take charge and “wear the pants” themselves. God help us all to repent of our sins, and may we do so specific to our sex, whether male or female! 

                In our present moment, men are still expected in some ways to uphold stability and society, yet in an emasculated fashion, always henpecked by the womanly of both sexes. Men are still to rescue the damsel in distress (that is, be blamed and take the blame for all the distress of women) while the damsel refuses to acknowledge her distress or that she can even be considered a “damsel”. As a result of this, many men have either fallen in line by cutting off their masculine drive and self-respect, or by at least selectively toeing the line now imposed upon them by feministic egalitarianism. They will arise to defend the woman, the weak, the stranger far away, but will not stand to defend their fellow man, the one in need nearby, nor will they admire and model themselves after the strong and successful. The feminist gaze keeps them captured, and they can only be dubbed “manly” by upholding the feministic and egalitarian order. Otherwise, they must be soft and gentle, non-threatening, against adventure, risk averse, and dare only to never be daring. This flows from a soft, meek and mild version of Jesus Christ and Christianity as well.

                Other men have reacted hard against this, and are seeking to get stronger physically, sometimes swearing off of women entirely, and are either turning to what they see as more masculine forms of Christianity, or more often than not, are rejecting Christianity (or at least churches) altogether as a soft religion for pesky women. Scandalously, many of our churches and pastors are in fact feminized, following the spirit of our age rather than being the daring, counter-cultural, prophetic voice of God as understood through the Scriptures. Yet the overreaction and over-correction by some men is not actually masculine either, but often an expression of bitterness, hopelessness, and weakness, resorting to whininess and impotency, and therefore effeminacy.

The Compromise of Complementarianism

More conservative churches since about the 1970’s or 1980’s have championed what is commonly called complementarianism. But complementarianism has become (or perhaps always was) a halfway house between biblical fidelity and full-blown feminism.[1] It says that men and women have differing roles to play, but these roles still yield an equal partnership, and the differing natures of men and women are either denied or dodged. In effect, this promotes asexuality, that men and women are sexless image bearers, but this is supposedly salvaged by calling men to fulfill the role of a male, and females are to uphold the role of a woman. But even these “roles” are hollowed out to a few Bible verses, mostly saying that while women cannot be ordained to preach, they can still be paid on church staff and earn seminary degrees to qualify them for “un-ordained” ministry in the church. Why? Because the distinction between male and female is not rooted in their differing sexes, but merely in “roles” they play or act out. The worst expressions of this are succinctly put as “a woman can do anything an unordained man can do” because it is claimed there are no natural differences between male and female, and it is further claimed this is all Scripture forbids. Both claims are false.

It is often said that women counselors are needed in the church because men cannot effectively minister to women. So sometimes “sex” differences are noticed, sometimes they are ignored, but always in the direction of feminized egalitarian ends. The sexes are flattened out to sameness, and yet women still are said to need other women to lead them. But where Scripture says women ought to lead (in the home, under and in obedience to their husband and as caretakers of the children, Titus 2:3-5), this is either outright despised or a point of embarrassment for many in our churches today, including many complementarians. Too many church officers are weakened men who allow themselves to be henpecked by their hardened wives or the emboldened women in their congregations who themselves have not been governed well by their fathers and husbands.

                So then, men must be called to be men indeed. Stop letting the feminization of society and Christianity prevent you from being a godly man. Do not despair and become bitter, for that is not manly and only neuters yourself in a different way. Do not emasculate yourself at our culture’s demand and become an effeminate gal-pal. Do not embrace the assertiveness and toughness of a man without the righteousness and wisdom that God also created man to embody and exercise in his life and leadership. Love women, even though they are rebellious, especially in this age, for so are many men and so has the church been down through the ages. Possess and express the faith that real men are to have in Christ, the great and worthy God-Man. Be the visionary that so many men refuse to be, provided you have this gifting, calling, and opportunity. Blaze the trail for a godly, masculine public square once more, doing so at the scale and capacity the Lord has allotted to you. This often begins with the formation of a family, with marriage and children, but includes work and other duties prior to or apart from marriage. It takes just one godly, feminine woman to be found, or more likely formed and wooed by your masculine strength and Christian virtue. Let the countless feminist women despise you, and the emasculated men as well. Show that you are a responsible man by working hard even when the deck is stacked against you. Be diligent in corporate worship on Sundays, studying the Scriptures, praying to the Lord, and not in a soft and effete fashion, but one praying for great things, beginning with the great need of killing your own sin by the power of the Spirit, being guided by God’s Word, in order that you may rule yourself and your household well.

Call out with firmness, but not in bitterness, the feminizing of things today, while also modeling and showing a better way forward through self-discipline. Persevere against daunting challenges by cultivating physical health and strength, ingenuity, and the open desire to have a wife that will submit to you, follow you, support you, bear your children and nurture them as her primary and chief calling that God has given to her. Show that you value such a glorious woman, and that the domestic sphere and work of bearing and rearing children and keeping the home is highly prized and desirable in your eyes. Note that the loveliness of your wife would be matched by her tenderness and sympathy directed where it should go, which is toward her husband and her children whom she loves dearly above all else, save God Himself. Cast that vision to women, no matter that many women (and foolish men) will sneer at you. Some will secretly appreciate it or at least be convicted by it. They cannot help it, for it is in their nature and will return and renew them if they haven’t utterly suppressed and unsexed themselves. If your weak male friends or even men at your church tell you this is too firm, provided you are addressing these things with love for the Lord and love for both men and women, tell them that they are too soft. Help them see that only a loving, masculine, Spirit-wrought firmness and insistence on reality and God’s good design for the distinct sexes can be the rock that men and women, churches, and our society desperately need. Pray humbly and importunately before the Lord to bless these efforts, that you would not be a hypocrite or merely play-acting, but rather your words would be the overflowing of your true character and righteous heart. Pray the Lord would then soften and shape the heart of one woman to see that you are striving to be a masculine, virtuous, pious Christian man who would be as a prophet, priest, and king to her, a protector and provider in both physical and spiritual needs, whom she would be blessed to help and have for a head, a husband.

Ladies, I would exhort you to receive such a man as described above as a godly, virtuous example of biblical masculinity. Cultivate in yourself an appreciation for such men, and a desire to marry such a man if you desire marriage (most men and women should marry). Do not allow churches or society today to beat out of you that natural, feminine instinct to nurture, to desire to help others, and in particular the desire to help a particular man and to become his wife, his helpmeet. Proverbs 31 is a great place to start considering the domestic calling and labors for true womanhood and female piety. While it is centered around the home and serving the family, it does not leave you always tied to the kitchen. A godly woman is glad to serve in the kitchen, indeed barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen, but also cultivates her children, educates them, works willingly with her hands, makes a profit from the goods that she herself created, and then with that profit considers a field and buys it in order to plant a vineyard. Strength is in your arms and wisdom flows from your lips (Prov. 31:17, 26), but that strength and wisdom is not as a man, it is not masculine. It is a feminine strength and wisdom, expressed with kindness and tenderness, and you must learn to differentiate feminine strength and wisdom from masculine strength and wisdom, since our communities and many churches have done all they can to make them identical.

                It is against this backdrop of our feminized and egalitarian society that I submit these daily entries concerning male and female piety. They are structured such that a particular Bible verse or passage is covered for seven days, a full week. Each day alternates between addresses to men and women, and then on the seventh day, both men and women are addressed together. Further, the topics of male and female piety are focused in four areas, changing every 13 weeks. Here are the four categories:

1.) Man and Woman in the Image of God

2.) Man and Woman in the Home

3.) Man and Woman in the Church

4.) Man and Woman in Society

This orderly and layered structure means you will be considering male and female virtue and piety from 52 different passages of Scripture in a year, and quarterly or seasonally the focus of consideration shifts.  Each day’s entry will cover no more than one page in your printed book. Though most days will alternate between addressing man and woman, both need direction today in understanding not only their own sex and calling, but that of the opposite sex as well. So do not skip entries just because roughly half of them are not addressed to your sex!

This book in brief paints a complete picture for what man and woman are and how they are to live in these sexually broken times. I have written this to be beneficial for single men and women as well as for the married. Most single folks should be urged to marry as the Lord calls them, but also to use their time in the unmarried state productively and as likely preparation for future marriage as well. Various daily entries will address young and old, divorced and widowed, and the various relations we may have in the church and society as well.

It is my desire that this work would be used to strengthen men and soften women, as is proper to each, so that the necessary foundation would be poured again for productive manhood and womanhood, the formation of faithful and fruitful marriages would truly cultivate children raised in the nurture and admonition of the Lord according to the appropriate piety of their particular gender, all of which reflects Christ and the Church in the marriage and family (Eph. 5:22ff.). As the family is the seedbed of society, so the household or family government is the necessary foundation for civil and ecclesiastical government. When the rod is sinfully spared and children are led astray or allowed to stray, future men will not wield the sword of justice in civil government, nor will they exercise the keys of the kingdom of heaven in church government in a righteous and biblical fashion. They will spare the rod on their own children and thereby show that they hate them (Prov. 13:24). These future women will not gladly submit to their husband’s headship and be fruitful and productive in the domestic sphere, but rebel against this and undermine the labors of men while neglecting their own calling. May the Lord remedy these great evils in our nation today, and work in our hearts by His Word and Spirit to renew us in His image and recover masculine and feminine virtue and piety for His glory, our good, and the good of the nations and societies upon all the face of the earth.

               


 

The Creation of Male and Female

Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.  [Genesis 1:26-28]

Mankind, male and female, is uniquely made in God’s image in both body and soul. This is seen in man and woman being given dominion over all of creation, under God and for God’s glory. Mankind is more valuable than the rest of creation and is entrusted to bring out the potential God has embedded in His creation. God breathed life into man, thereby distinguishing him from the animals and rendering mankind morally responsible, created in God’s image for the purpose of worshiping and serving the Lord on earth. As God took great care in creating, so must we in exercising dominion over His creation. It is natural and proper that animals (beasts of burden) would help us develop the earth, and at least following man’s fall into sin, that man would kill and eat animals for nourishment and use animal furs and wool for clothing and warmth. But it is wickedness and inversion of God’s created order for animals to harm man. When a wild beast or goring animal like an ox kills a human being, whether a man or a woman, we recognize that the animal ought to be put to death (Ex. 21:28-29). When a hunter kills his prey, that is not wickedness but an exercise of dominion, especially if the killing is not for mere sport but to use the meat and fur of the animal for the benefit of his fellow man.

While it should go without saying, God has designed men to be the hunters, not women. This does not mean women, especially if they are with men, can never go hunting for sport or out of necessity. Scripture gives no account of a female hunter, yet multiple accounts of male hunters, such as Nimrod and Esau.

Not all men were hunters in Bible times or throughout history, but all men should be protectors and providers, and the first to combat danger in their home, church, and society. David was a faithful shepherd boy, delivering the lambs from the mouths of lions and bears (1 Sam. 17:34), which prepared him to have the courage to face Goliath and the tenacity to lead Israel as a conquering Warrior-King. This masculine virtue is necessary because the world is dangerous and wicked. Sometimes the evil or danger comes from other men and leaders, at other times it is wild animals or natural disasters like earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, mudslides, or wildfires. Men who alleviate these dangers should be praised for their sacrificial service, for almost all women cannot by nature fulfill this service, and even many men are ill-suited to do so.

 



[1] For more on this, please read Rev. Zach Garris’s excellent book Masculine Christianity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

William Gouge's Domestical Duties: Quotes and Comments

 I hope to begin a post here that I periodically update, of quotations from William Gouge's Of Domestical Duties. I am going to quote from this version primarily: https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/gouge/Domestical%20Duties%20-%20William%20Gouge.pdf  The book has been said to have been as popular as Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and Matthew Henry's commentaries in its heyday. Gouge was one of the chief members of the Westminster Assembly of Divines, which gave us the Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms. In short, the substance of what Gouge wrote was held by most all the Westminster Divines/Puritans on home and family life, regarding marriage, children, duties of husband to wife, wife to husband, children to parents, parents to children, and also servants and masters to one another.  Here is an extended quotation of Gouge that I will start with, and add to later. Enjoy.  "The third reason taken from an husband's resemblance unto Christ herein, ...

Declaration on the Error of Egalitarianism and its Effect on Society, the Church, and Related Matters

* THE FOLLOWING DECLARATION REPRESENTS THE GENERAL VIEWS OF THE SESSION OF HERITAGE REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (HRPC) ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE FULL VIEWS OF THE COVENANT REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DENOMINATION OR ANY OTHER DENOMINATION, ORGANIZATION, OR BODY OF CHURCHES, THOUGH IT IS THE DESIRE OF HRPC THAT THIS DECLARATION WOULD BE HELPFUL TO AND EVEN ADOPTED BY OTHER CHURCHES, PRESBYTERIES, AND DENOMINATIONS. THIS DECLARATION IS NOT A BINDING DOCUMENT WITH CREEDAL AUTHORITY BUT IS FOR INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIVE PURPOSES AND IS SUBJECT TO POSSIBLE REFINEMENT IN THE FUTURE. Declaration on the Error of Egalitarianism and its Effect on the Family, Society, the Church, and Related Matters In 2005, the Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (CRPC) unanimously adopted Distinctives summarizing what sets her apart from other Presbyterian bodies. Under “Civil Magistrates,” the CRPC affirms: “We further acknowledge that God’s work at the Tower of Babel and His gathering o...

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...