Skip to main content

Matthew Henry Opposes Feminist Egalitarianism with 1 Peter 3 and Galatians 3:28

 

This simple distinction that Matthew Henry makes here is the very one our nation and most of our churches are incapable of making today. This is because we are more catechized by a feminized Egalitarianism than God's word on this point, or even our own Reformed catechisms and commentators:

"And as being heirs together: another reason why husbands should give honour to their wives, viz. because though by nature they are weak and unequal to their husbands, yet they are equal to them in respect of their being called to the same grace and glory, there being neither male nor female in Christ, Galatians 3:28."

Today, if you say that women or the female sex are "weak and unequal" in any sense, especially by nature, you will be accused of claiming that women are unequal in the latter sense that Henry lists here, namely, you will be accused of saying women are not equal to men in terms of being called to grace and glory. They will use the very same passage, Galatians 3:28, to make this accusation against you. This is because they are Egalitarians, whether they realize it or not. We all have to fight the Egalitarian beast around us and likely within us.

Then if you insist on this point, of women being the weaker sex naturally, you will likely be met with frustration or at least confusion as to why a Christian would need to mention this. You will be accused of being obsessive, imbalanced, if not harsh and outright hateful of women (a misogynist). But the answer should be obvious -- God Himself impresses this point in Scripture through Peter (and others), in the very text Henry is commenting on, 1 Pet. 3:7. It is in part because of the natural weakness of the woman/wife that the man/husband is to honor her, which includes patience and tender care, and committing to nourish and invest in her, as a good husband must do.

Such a faithful husband reflects Christ, who pours Himself into His body and bride, the Church, who without Him would be all the more weak and in great need, but with Christ the Lord is strong, fruitful, and productive. And so we also see in the immediately preceding verses in 1 Peter 3 that Sarah is commended for having a gentle and quiet spirit that obeys her husband Abraham and calls him "lord". She recognizes her husband in the home is as a lord to her, and she is thankful for this. And husbands should not deny their headship or authority in the home, but use it for good, and to recognize that the first honor and labor of that headship or lordship is to be exercised toward and for the good of the wife, his cherished body and bride whom he should tenderly love and lead, thereby giving honor to the weaker vessel who is nevertheless Spiritually a co-heir and co-equal in Christ and the kingdom of God.

This has to be said and insisted upon because it is true, and especially because even Christians who profess to be conservative and Bible-believing have either forgotten this, misunderstood this, or in most cases we all have been taught wrongly on this crucial matter. As a result, men are not performing their duties as heads (at least not fully) and women are left with a weak head, and often too big of a head and too hard of a heart for themselves. And a soft, submissive, and passive man with a hardened, stubborn and insistent wife is the opposite of what a husband and wife should be, and is the opposite of what men and women in general should be. It is contrary to the natures, glories, and designs that God has made and given to men and women as male and female, and thereby it creates a contradiction within themselves. It is not just sin against a gender role, but a sin against your gender, your sex or nature that God has made you in His image to possess and reflect well, whether male or female. It is self-destructive and that weakness and destruction, even if unintended, will manifest itself in your marriage, toward your children, and toward others.

If men love the Lord and their wives and women in general, they will lovingly insist on these realities for God's glory and the good of both male and female. So will godly women, just look at Titus 2 and what the older women admonish and teach the younger women to do. It is to be a faithful, obedient, industrious wife, mother, and homemaker, which are the very things the Proverbs 31 woman is praised for. May the Lord help us all, both male and female, to be and to do what God has designed us to be and called us to do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

William Gouge's Domestical Duties: Quotes and Comments

 I hope to begin a post here that I periodically update, of quotations from William Gouge's Of Domestical Duties. I am going to quote from this version primarily: https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/gouge/Domestical%20Duties%20-%20William%20Gouge.pdf  The book has been said to have been as popular as Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and Matthew Henry's commentaries in its heyday. Gouge was one of the chief members of the Westminster Assembly of Divines, which gave us the Westminster Confession of Faith and Catechisms. In short, the substance of what Gouge wrote was held by most all the Westminster Divines/Puritans on home and family life, regarding marriage, children, duties of husband to wife, wife to husband, children to parents, parents to children, and also servants and masters to one another.  Here is an extended quotation of Gouge that I will start with, and add to later. Enjoy.  "The third reason taken from an husband's resemblance unto Christ herein, ...

Declaration on the Error of Egalitarianism and its Effect on Society, the Church, and Related Matters

* THE FOLLOWING DECLARATION REPRESENTS THE GENERAL VIEWS OF THE SESSION OF HERITAGE REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (HRPC) ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE FULL VIEWS OF THE COVENANT REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DENOMINATION OR ANY OTHER DENOMINATION, ORGANIZATION, OR BODY OF CHURCHES, THOUGH IT IS THE DESIRE OF HRPC THAT THIS DECLARATION WOULD BE HELPFUL TO AND EVEN ADOPTED BY OTHER CHURCHES, PRESBYTERIES, AND DENOMINATIONS. THIS DECLARATION IS NOT A BINDING DOCUMENT WITH CREEDAL AUTHORITY BUT IS FOR INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIVE PURPOSES AND IS SUBJECT TO POSSIBLE REFINEMENT IN THE FUTURE. Declaration on the Error of Egalitarianism and its Effect on the Family, Society, the Church, and Related Matters In 2005, the Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (CRPC) unanimously adopted Distinctives summarizing what sets her apart from other Presbyterian bodies. Under “Civil Magistrates,” the CRPC affirms: “We further acknowledge that God’s work at the Tower of Babel and His gathering o...

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...