Skip to main content

Today's Thoughts- Which Turned Into A Longer Entry Than I Desired

Ah yes, the great challenge to connote deep meaning concisely as possible. At least this may force me to use bigger words.

Today's thought of the day is about engaging in culture. Perhaps another way to express it is this- should Christians strive to separate from the culture of unbelievers, or Christianize the culture of unbelievers?

For instance, rap music. All I ever heard from rap music lyrically was debauched. Sin, sin sin, sin, and more sin. Sometimes it was very heinous sin too, like raping someone's mother, or murdering someone just because you don't like them all that much.

That lead me, and many other Christians I think, to come to the conclusion, "Rap music is bad, there is no such thing as holy hip hop; anyone who tries to be a Christian and rap is going to bed with with world's music. Rap music, by its very sound and nature, appeals to the sinful flesh."

In other words, rap, and probably rock music too, has often been viewed as sinful. Just the "sound" of rock music and rap music takes your mind to sinful places, or gives you an unclean, impure feeling. Therefore, rock and rap should be avoided at all costs. That was probably my mindset for a good while, even though I didn't really outwardly express it, and I think others have/have had a similar view on things.

Then I heard Lecrae and Shai Linne and other Christian rappers, and I went to the Baptist Student Union at UNC-Pembroke where they actually played Christian hymns in a more contemporary, rock type fashion, and I realized my sin. Rock and Rap, and really any form of music, is not in and of itself sinful, no more than facebook or eating potato chips are. I really believe the reason it has come to be regarded as "unclean" is because it is the popular music of the unbelieving, sinful world of today, and therefore, the lyrics are going to be crass and crude. The reason our minds can go to sinful places or give us a feeling of sinfulness just at the sound of rock or rap music isn't because rap or rock has some mysterious sinful power to it, but because we have grown so accustomed to the sinful lyrics expressed through this genre of music that it has become a mental knee-jerk reaction to think of sinful things and to perhaps even feel unsafe, uncomfortable, and sinful.

This is getting long so I have got to close. I have incrementally come to the position that we need to both engage the culture as it is, as in infiltrate it and produce Christian musicians and artists and film makers who do not go out of the way to try to create some sort of "Christian" genre. In other words, Christian rap and Chrsitian rock is absolutely fine, as long as the lyrics are biblically and theologically sound, and that starts with a solid presentation of the gospel and the sinfulness of man. Lecrae, Shai Linne, Tedashii, and other Christian rappers are an outstanding example of this.

Yet, is it not ironic how those who can't stand classical music or traditional artwork and architecture or old-school film styles (you know, back when it wasn't packed full of action and acting actually mattered) on the grounds that those things have resulted in traditionalism and lack of variety have actually created a new type of traditionalism, which is the very thing they have claimed to want to escape?

We need variety. We need to be creating new styles of music and art and film and so on as Christians. Yes, do what the culture does today, make it better. Yes, go old school and try to recapture the power and glory of it. And also, be innovate, be inventors, create the next great style of film, artwork, architecture, book, or music. We need it all, because different styles are more suited, and better suited, to display certain aspects of God's glory and particular attributes, than others. Just as we are all part of the body of Christ, but not all the same, each with our specific roles, so is different styles of culture- each brings something to the table that we as Christians need to advance and master to glorify God.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true faith, is

Some Problems in the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America)

By: Thomas F. Booher NOTE: I posted what's below to Facebook on this day, December 6, 2016. I wanted to post this here for record keeping and so that it can have a more visible and permanent viewership for those concerned or wishing to be more informed about the PCA.  I would like to explain my love for and grave concerns within the PCA (Presbyterian Church in America), the denomination in which I am currently a member and have served as a ruling elder. The state of the PCA is, in my estimation, not a consistently conservative, orthodox, and confessional one. I believe it is in the midst of much compromise, and I do not think that the average lay person is aware of it. It grieves me to say these things. I wish they were not true. I grew up in the PCA, and until several years ago I was still under the delusion that all was well in this denomination, that it was, by and large, holding fast to the Word of God. I still believe that there are many