Skip to main content

Outcasts Book Review



By: Thomas F. Booher





Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars.

Outcasts is the second book in Jill Williamson's Safe Lands series, and I have found the writing to be largely the same as the first book (for my remarks on that, go here, here, and here). The back cover (of this advanced copy at least) will tell you what you need to know for the story. A family/tribe from Glenrock has been taken by force to the Safe Lands, where everyone has a disease that is slowly killing them, called the thin plague. The children are being held, and the women through artificial means are forced to bear children in the hopes that they are healthy and can repopulate the land. 

The story revolves largely around three siblings, Levi, Mason, and Omar, who each have different personalities, strengths, and weaknesses that make it challenging for them to do what they must do. Levi is married, but the other two are dealing with romantic feelings which plays out quite well. Omar is a user, and I very much like how his character develops, but I think I like Mason even more, possibly because I relate to him the most. 

I would say that this story is as much about how the Safe Lands changes you due to its hedonistic culture as it is about the people of Glenrock being rescued from the Safe Lands. After all, if they are rescued, will it matter if they aren't who they used to be? If they have lost who they are, they won't go back to their family structure when they leave, in which case the Safe Lands still wins. In the Safe Lands, each child is everyone's child, there are no real mothers and fathers. This is the focal point of Williamson's story, and it is a much needed one considering the crossroads our culture is facing today. 

Actually, we have already lost our children haven't we? This is really a book that promotes homeschooling, that promotes spending time with your family and teaching them God's Word, something I highly value. Yet I think Williamson is also cautioning against the dangers of sheltering your children from what is actually just God honoring fun as well. We are called to engage this world, yet to be separate from it in our lifestyles. That's the hard line we are called to walk, and it is the one Christ walked perfectly. 

I'm not sure if this is a trilogy or not, but it seems to be setting up as one. If so, I am looking forward to the finale, mainly to see what happens with each character, how they turn out, more than if they get out of the Safe Lands (because we know of course they will). Here's to hoping that Jill Williamson doesn't wreck a good story with a too perfectly happy ending that takes shortcuts to resolve the inward spiritual strife of the main characters. That would be a shame, because right now there is an opportunity to really show the effects of sin and temptation, and that the end of these things is death.   


In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book from the publisher. 


Outcasts can be purchased here.


Comments

  1. The book is a trilogy and the third book is scheduled to be released, I think in December? This year, anyway. I can't wait because I really loved the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice review. I agree, it sounds like the author is cautioning us about making sure of our priorities; especially with our children.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the review! I enjoyed reading your thoughts on the book. Yes, this is a trilogy. Last time I checked it will come out this August. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think in my humble opinion that "books" are taking the place of genuine faith as the bible proclaims.these books are to me a distraction from the real world. just like the left without a mind I mean left behind books. no substance..I wish my wife would read the word with me ...blessings to all of you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Stone Choir/Corey Mahler Invert God's Revelation

https://coreyjmahler.com/the-european-peoples-and-christianity/  *****EDIT: Some have said that they, or at least Corey Mahler perhaps believes, that the European religions were deviations from Christianity, believed by Noah and his sons. Over time, sinful man and demons twisted these European religions, which I think their argument is that it was originally Christian/derived from Noah and his offspring. Nordic paganism had the most in common with Christianity, even with Odin sacrificing himself on a tree, and therefore the Europeans were the most ripe and ready to embrace Christianity and continue to advance the cause of Christ more than other peoples/races/nations over the last 2,000 years since Christ.  To that I simply say, I appreciate the context given, but even if all that were true (maybe it is, maybe it is not), it doesn't change the fundamental points of my post below. Syncretism, Odinism, etc., even if it was somehow a distorted derivation flowing from the true...

Why Pastors Shouldn't Preach In Jeans (Especially Skinny Jeans)

By: Thomas F. Booher I can't think of a better way to get labeled a legalist than to title a post like this. Hopefully by the end you will not see this as legalism and will see this as what it is- my attempt at describing what I believe is proper ecclesiology as defined by God in Scripture. So then, what is church? What does Scripture say we should be doing and not doing on Sunday mornings? That's what I want to explore. The Bible says to gather together in Christ's name; to teach, encourage, and admonish one another; to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thankfulness in our hearts to God (Heb. 10:24-25; Mat. 18:20; Col. 3:16). There are to be deacons (Acts 6:1-6) and elders (Ti. 1:5) in the church who act as overseers, and in the case of elders, are the shepherds of the flock who teach the word and rebuke with authority (Ti. 1:9).  God must call one to be a pastor/elder (Eph. 4:11). As such those who are called by God to preach the word are held to a ...

Ordered Loves, Inequalities, Supremacy, and "Racism"

 By: Thomas F. Booher  Today, being a white Christian man in the United States and holding to properly ordered loves (a good definition of which is given here:  https://americanreformer.org/2024/12/rightly-ordered-love/ )  consistently and publicly will get you labeled as a "racist" or "white supremacist" or something similar soon enough.  In fact, you do not even have to be white or a man to be labeled something like a "white supremacist". But there's a rule out there today that if you can't find a minority to say it first, then what you are saying is bigoted, racist, etc.  I like the phrase/terminology of "properly ordered loves" because it is harder to slander/bear false witness against. It is harder to reduce down to some sort of scary word like "racist" or "kinist" or "supremacist" or "nazi" or whatever. I would say I also like the notion of "family first", but apparently some have ev...