Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from 2025

Wedding Homily: "A Faithful Marriage"

A Wedding Homily on Genesis 1, Titus 2, Ephesians 5, and other passages: “A Faithful Marriage” Our message from God’s Word is titled “A Faithful Marriage”. The true purpose and picture of a faithful marriage is not popular today, sadly even in many of our churches and among some of our ministers. We live in a day when many are not even sure what a man or a woman is. No wonder, then, that we do not know what a husband and a wife are to be in the bonds of holy matrimony. Thankfully, our Lord has made clear in the Scriptures that He has created mankind in His image and according to His likeness, as male and female. He said in Genesis 1 the purpose of creating man in His image was for them to have dominion over His creation. God blessed us and commanded us to “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” But God did not create man and woman to have thi...

What is "Christian Nationalism"?

  I was asked recently what "Christian Nationalism" means. Well, for me, to be fairly simplistic, it means we want God's law/righteous government in our nation(s). God has ordained civil magistrates, per Romans 13, 1 Peter 2, and other passages, to promote/praise what is good and punish what is evil. It has been given the sword of justice by God to do this, not the keys of the kingdom of heaven. But just as the rod of correction is given by God in the home to the parents and father especially, and is used by God and conducive to the child's learning of the dangers of sin/law-breaking, pointing to the need of redemption as the Gospel is taught in the home, so even civil government can be used by God to not only curb evil to uphold justice in a land, but by that very action, also point the people of a nation toward righteousness, by deterring them from committing crime/evil and praising those who do good (who worship God, repent and believe in Christ, who honor the Sabb...

Matthew Henry on Paul Pleading His Privilege of Roman Citizenship

  Matthew Henry on the Apostle Paul pleading his Roman Citizenship Privilege in Acts 22: "Paul pleaded his privilege as a Roman citizen, by which he was exempted from all trials and punishments of this nature (v. 25): As they bound him with thongs, or leathern bands, to the whipping post, as they used to bind the vilest of malefactors in bridewell from whom they would extort a confession, he made no outcry against the injustice of their proceedings against an innocent man, but very mildly let them understand the illegality of their proceedings against him as a citizen of Rome, which he had done once before at Philippi after he had been scourged (ch. 16:37), but here he makes use of it for prevention. He said to the centurion that stood by, "You know the law; pray is it lawful for you who are yourselves Romans to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned?" The manner of his speaking plainly intimates what a holy security and serenity of mind this good man enjoyed, no...

Calvin on Romans 11 and Jewish Exclusion and Gentile Inclusion

 This is only part of Calvin's commentary. To see more, go here: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/calvin/romans/11.htm  Romans 11:16-21 16. For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches. 16. Quod si primitiae sanctae, etiam conspersio; et si radix sancta etiam rami: 17. And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; 17. Si vero ex ramis quidam defracti sunt, tu vero oleaster quum esses, insitus es pro ipsis, et particeps factus es radicis et pinguedinis oleae; 18. Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. 18. Ne contra ramos glorieris: quod si gloriaris, non tu radicem portas; sed radix to. 19. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in. 19. Dices ergo, Defracti sunt rami, ut ego insererer. 20. Well; because...

Quick Comments on John's Gospel

  John 1:1-5 -- "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it." Jesus Christ is the Word of God. Here we see that He was in the beginning with God, meaning that He has no beginning and thus is co-eternal with God. Not only that, but God/Jesus made all things, and life itself was and is in Him. You should note the illusions to the account of creation in Genesis 1, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." We see that the Triune God, each person of the Godhead, was involved in creation -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Father planned it, the Son performed the Father's plan, and the Holy Spirit is the power by which the plan is performed. So it is in renewal/recreation/re...

Charles Hodge on Innate/Hereditary Sinfulness, etc.

Much discussion about races and nations and strengths and weaknesses of each is taking place today, in our nation and churches. At the bottom, I am going to share some of my own thoughts in light of a recent debate that took place in part on this subject. But first, below is (in part) what well-known Reformed and Presbyterian Theologian Charles Hodge said regarding our being morally culpable for sinful dispositions that we have inherited from our Ancestors and our hereditary (from his systematic Theology, Volume 2, Part 2, Sections 6ff). : Charles Hodge on Being Morally Culpable for Sinful Dispositions Even if Inherited from our Ancestors (He argues to deny this is to move toward Pelagianism/somewhere in between): Consciousness proves that Dispositions as distinguished from Acts may have Moral Character By the mere moral philosopher, and by theologians whose theology is a philosophy, it is assumed as an axiom, or intuitive truth, that a man is responsible only for what he has fu...